1.5 sec in total
139 ms
966 ms
364 ms
Visit ss.lc now to see the best up-to-date Ss content for United Arab Emirates and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ss.lc
Get the most out of your social and online marketing efforts. Own, understand and activate your best audience through the power of the link with Bitly Brand Tools.
Visit ss.lcWe analyzed Ss.lc page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
ss.lc performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value3.0 s
79/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value2.9 s
96/100
10%
139 ms
67 ms
115 ms
62 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ss.lc, 24% (6 requests) were made to and 8% (2 requests) were made to D3h5jhobc20ump.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (374 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 257.6 kB (39%)
656.3 kB
398.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ss.lc main page is 656.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 349.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ss images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 92.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ss.lc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.7 kB or 38% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (29%)
17
12
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ss. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
bitly.com
139 ms
d5eb184df1ac43d713f3d09f38fd5a56.css
67 ms
jquery.min.js
115 ms
069286fe0e243e1e8ef67d2f60b784f8.js
62 ms
oct.js
49 ms
mys2uzu.js
209 ms
ways-brands-use-bitly.jpg
131 ms
marketing-analytics-tools.jpg
146 ms
case-study.jpg
161 ms
baaea3255487f3b82e6c343dfd42e5a9.jpg
128 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
fbevents.js
374 ms
adsct
150 ms
adsct
144 ms
1LNuLza
88 ms
1px.gif
46 ms
collect
15 ms
1px.gif
25 ms
d
116 ms
0OOBjex2FHHHXMcSecdMppZ5x1znkXXJTtksuuuOqa627IcdMtt8Mbu+ue+x54KNcjefI99kSBpwo981yRF1565bU33ir2znsffgC5pW7LAAA=
11 ms
9DjgY3sdhRxx1zHEnnHTKaWecdc55F1yU7ZLLrrjqmutuyHHTLbfDG7vrnvseeCjXI3nyPfZEgacKPfNckRdeeuW1N94q9s57H34AuaVuywAA
11 ms
0OOBjex2FHHHXMcSecdMppZ5x1znkXXJTtksuuuOqa627IcdMtt8Mbu+ue+x54KNcjefI99kSBpwo981yRF1565bU33ir2znsffgC5pW7LAAA=
10 ms
8tmb8BLpaWYw==
10 ms
8DXVmznw==
9 ms
y2ZvwGHeZac
8 ms
ss.lc accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
ss.lc best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
ss.lc SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ss.lc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ss.lc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ss.lc
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ss. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: