6.8 sec in total
2.5 sec
4.2 sec
180 ms
Welcome to ssms.in homepage info - get ready to check Ssms best content right away, or after learning these important things about ssms.in
SSMS School Software
Visit ssms.inWe analyzed Ssms.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ssms.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value1.2 s
100/100
25%
Value1.2 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
2505 ms
452 ms
26 ms
579 ms
772 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Ssms.in, 12% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ssms.in.
Page size can be reduced by 354.6 kB (29%)
1.2 MB
884.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Ssms.in main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 942.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ssms needs image optimization as it can save up to 137.2 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 147.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ssms.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (52%)
29
14
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ssms. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ssms.in
2505 ms
style.css
452 ms
css
26 ms
prettyPhoto.css
579 ms
superfish.css
772 ms
flexslider.css
946 ms
styles.css
647 ms
jquery.js
908 ms
modernizr-2.6.1-respond-1.1.0.min.js
691 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
796 ms
superfish.js
755 ms
custom.js
734 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
818 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1013 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1067 ms
scripts.js
1021 ms
normalize.min.css
609 ms
main.css
603 ms
bk_header.png
204 ms
loginlogo.jpg
185 ms
social.png
206 ms
banner_12.jpg
397 ms
banner_21.jpg
377 ms
banner_31.jpg
472 ms
banner_41.jpg
596 ms
banner_13.jpg
528 ms
Proposal.png
342 ms
support.png
467 ms
contact.png
458 ms
widget_title.png
476 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
32 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
32 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
33 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
31 ms
ssms.in accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
ssms.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
ssms.in SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ssms.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ssms.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ssms.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ssms. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: