1.2 sec in total
119 ms
919 ms
124 ms
Click here to check amazing Starfield Tech content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about starfieldtech.com
Visit starfieldtech.comWe analyzed Starfieldtech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 119 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
starfieldtech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value11,180 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.913
3/100
15%
Value19.2 s
2/100
10%
119 ms
181 ms
27 ms
39 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Starfieldtech.com, 60% (33 requests) were made to Nebula.wsimg.com and 16% (9 requests) were made to Img4.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (461 ms) relates to the external source Nebula.wsimg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 307.4 kB (56%)
546.4 kB
239.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Starfieldtech.com main page is 546.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 185.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Starfield Tech needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 97.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.9 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 92.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starfieldtech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (52%)
52
25
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starfield Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
starfieldtech.com
119 ms
www.starfieldtech.com
181 ms
css
27 ms
css
39 ms
css
49 ms
site.css
120 ms
duel.js
15 ms
5ad7ed8182000d8a5b9be60b33f6f925
72 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
a11631e9c893c2975be1b87192cee92d
59 ms
0e3e48ff6dd6e15421ad01e74f1d3ae8
65 ms
getSeal
392 ms
jq.js
97 ms
0b4dff865a9d412b97719bcc7be127ed
72 ms
font-awesome.min.css
13 ms
40817503ae96da7a3591be55c462d6f4
80 ms
bac9b3d6fdb22fa6f43a1306b6c0cd2f
40 ms
c6008d7b03a3a8876ced639ccde47766
41 ms
3c8ff159d99497ec9f5b25ad03e5c7e3
63 ms
5361dbbdfac435f189d01845fe9f2039
60 ms
9c8e373d5f30143ecc8e83e1c691f324
79 ms
473dcd75a173eee111aee13f101b1574
77 ms
0f649f86f9e6c54f92159aaaa1d2db0e
78 ms
5e2eb09892ccaae9192b62289c7c887c
88 ms
0bbf42816d705b0864b4bc2be4e20e86
88 ms
76d3617adebcfc56e2cf3f3cd121a527
91 ms
61aa8f4709cb9d185dbaee6e5de6313b
88 ms
4bc978c70fc76e31a1ad4eae3240add0
461 ms
818a38a4510ea2d17a4a394b8bc68b3e
233 ms
b928dadfa37a4a3602027c466705ae36
126 ms
8e722fa74bfd02f08b91e9b14838485d
112 ms
e1420bf45ef42fe154d653c48fdbb56a
114 ms
1c38fe06c3f4597bb44f28878caf623c
117 ms
a1cea6984a9597ec0c3c98da610bf786
141 ms
ea53d924afabc80ec3826093da554e2a
142 ms
4aaaedb15278c8477962ef67949a7e2f
143 ms
1e32c7e51d6025274e2ac00519fffa27
145 ms
394191b0bad276d5a673f654c2818cfa
167 ms
58b0ae5d8a2fa01ae081e6b46022fc84
168 ms
7e9c3a43694461659938c38ef4a184d9
168 ms
media.gallery.js
13 ms
9fe0fdb4265746eaccfb29f79be89359
152 ms
7165236ca5fc925d7a75828564191eda
169 ms
util.instances.js
5 ms
util.model.js
11 ms
documentHelper.js
12 ms
ec9b5b6f5f093059f2212a97091d558c
163 ms
9aac14416718c783dbcd182d70da79fb
122 ms
siteseal_sf_3_h_l_m.gif
60 ms
cookiemanager.js
21 ms
iebackground.js
7 ms
ga.js
24 ms
utag.js
7 ms
util.window.js
22 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
starfieldtech.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
starfieldtech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
starfieldtech.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starfieldtech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Starfieldtech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
starfieldtech.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Starfield Tech. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: