4.3 sec in total
387 ms
2.8 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Stegmax content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stegmax.com
Грамматика и лексика английского языка: IELTS, TOEFL, ЕГЭ на высокий балл с первого раза. Онлайн упражнения, тесты и тренажеры.
Visit stegmax.comWe analyzed Stegmax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 387 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
stegmax.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value5.4 s
21/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value2,880 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.54
14/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
387 ms
1149 ms
46 ms
61 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stegmax.com, 97% (83 requests) were made to Ru.stegmax.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Ru.stegmax.com.
Page size can be reduced by 164.5 kB (31%)
531.9 kB
367.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Stegmax.com main page is 531.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 199.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 161.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 161.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stegmax images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 193 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stegmax.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (90%)
82
8
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stegmax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 53 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stegmax.com
387 ms
ru.stegmax.com
1149 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
46 ms
wc-blocks-style.css
61 ms
wc-memberships-blocks.min.css
82 ms
learndash_quiz_front.min.css
51 ms
jquery.dropdown.min.css
52 ms
wc-memberships-frontend.min.css
59 ms
woocommerce-base.min.css
82 ms
ielts-writing.png
25 ms
toefl-writing.png
12 ms
ege-english.png
11 ms
oge-english.png
9 ms
style.min.css
26 ms
learndash_lesson_video.min.css
23 ms
learndash.min.css
31 ms
js_composer.min.css
44 ms
d0148e1651a8a0290735426315d53da7.css
72 ms
bootstrap-light.min.css
39 ms
base.min.css
78 ms
v4-shims.min.css
91 ms
all.min.css
83 ms
widget-recent-post-comments.min.css
98 ms
widget-wd-recent-posts.min.css
94 ms
widget-nav.min.css
93 ms
woo-widget-wd-layered-nav.min.css
96 ms
opt-lazy-load.min.css
94 ms
wp-gutenberg.min.css
133 ms
base-deprecated.min.css
133 ms
int-wpb-base.min.css
127 ms
int-wpb-base-deprecated.min.css
129 ms
woo-opt-sticky-notices.min.css
130 ms
mod-star-rating.min.css
128 ms
woo-el-track-order.min.css
135 ms
woo-gutenberg.min.css
135 ms
header-base.min.css
139 ms
mod-tools.min.css
132 ms
header-el-base.min.css
142 ms
el-social-icons.min.css
136 ms
el-info-box.min.css
140 ms
mod-nav-menu-label.min.css
142 ms
wpb-el-banner.min.css
143 ms
mod-highlighted-text.min.css
145 ms
header-el-my-account-dropdown.min.css
145 ms
woo-opt-social-login.min.css
144 ms
woo-mod-login-form.min.css
147 ms
header-el-my-account.min.css
145 ms
js
150 ms
el-responsive-text.min.css
145 ms
el-section-title.min.css
131 ms
int-wbp-el-animations.min.css
126 ms
lib-owl-carousel.min.css
120 ms
el-testimonial-old.min.css
121 ms
footer-base.min.css
90 ms
el-gallery.min.css
82 ms
opt-cookies.min.css
80 ms
xts-header_750531-1660243821.css
77 ms
xts-theme_settings_default-1663201392.css
76 ms
animate.min.css
196 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
70 ms
updateCartFragmentsFix.js
197 ms
selectWoo.full.min.js
195 ms
wc-memberships-blocks-common.min.js
194 ms
js.cookie.min.js
168 ms
woocommerce.min.js
376 ms
learndash.js
375 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
374 ms
device.min.js
372 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
372 ms
combine.min.js
371 ms
minerva-kb-common-ui.js
372 ms
minerva-kb.js
371 ms
waypoints.min.js
370 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
366 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
366 ms
lazyload.min.js
385 ms
v-mobileapp-img-bg.jpg
385 ms
jquery.min.js
246 ms
google-btn-icon.svg
263 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
56 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
547 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
370 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
10 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
21 ms
css
101 ms
updateCartFragmentsFix.js
132 ms
stegmax.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
stegmax.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stegmax.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stegmax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stegmax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stegmax.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stegmax. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: