2.2 sec in total
382 ms
1.7 sec
178 ms
Visit stitchalley.com now to see the best up-to-date Stitchalley content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stitchalley.com
craft,cross-stitch,cross stitch,cross stitch letters,point de croix,free patterns,free cross stitch,broderie,cross-stitch kit,cross-stitch pattern,kit point-de-croix,cross stitch kits,créative,décorat...
Visit stitchalley.comWe analyzed Stitchalley.com page load time and found that the first response time was 382 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
stitchalley.com performance score
382 ms
401 ms
339 ms
611 ms
785 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Stitchalley.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (806 ms) belongs to the original domain Stitchalley.com.
Page size can be reduced by 324.6 kB (68%)
480.1 kB
155.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Stitchalley.com main page is 480.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 372.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 567 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stitchalley images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 243.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 243.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stitchalley.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (39%)
59
36
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stitchalley. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
stitchalley.com
382 ms
stylesheet.css
401 ms
carousel.css
339 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
611 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js
785 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css
806 ms
common.js
755 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
462 ms
show_ads.js
4 ms
ga.js
54 ms
logo.jpg
82 ms
gb.png
82 ms
fr.png
86 ms
arrow-down.png
82 ms
button-search.png
81 ms
menu.png
85 ms
SA191_LRG-140x140.gif
172 ms
smp03_LRG-140x140.gif
172 ms
mnch02_LRG-140x140.gif
193 ms
sa152_LRG-140x140.gif
171 ms
sa151_LRG-140x140.gif
173 ms
smp02_LRG-140x140.gif
226 ms
st0401_LRG-140x140.gif
199 ms
cs005_LRG-140x140.gif
212 ms
FL003_LRG-140x140.gif
214 ms
FL001_LRG-140x140.gif
230 ms
CS002_LRG-140x140.gif
255 ms
cs007_LRG-140x140.gif
263 ms
SMP15_LRG-140x140.gif
282 ms
fr010_LRG-140x140.gif
282 ms
SA019_LRG-120x120.gif
310 ms
SA044_LRG-120x120.gif
311 ms
SA186_LRG-120x120.gif
319 ms
SA187_LRG-120x120.gif
333 ms
SA188_LRG-120x120.gif
365 ms
SA189_LRG-120x120.gif
352 ms
SA190_LRG-120x120.gif
385 ms
SA191_LRG-120x120.gif
386 ms
SA018_LRG-120x120.gif
387 ms
SA058_LRG-120x120.gif
429 ms
SA185_LRG-120x120.gif
430 ms
SA184_LRG-120x120.gif
437 ms
button-previous.png
462 ms
button-next.png
463 ms
ca-pub-9109072751443806.js
50 ms
zrt_lookup.html
42 ms
show_ads_impl.js
54 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
background.png
423 ms
button.png
424 ms
ads
224 ms
osd.js
12 ms
m_js_controller.js
19 ms
abg.js
34 ms
favicon
33 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
33 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
25 ms
s
15 ms
x_button_blue2.png
5 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
3 ms
stitchalley.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stitchalley.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Stitchalley.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stitchalley.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stitchalley. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: