2.1 sec in total
251 ms
1.6 sec
245 ms
Click here to check amazing Stlf content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stlf.net
Today Headlines, Breaking news and Latest News
Visit stlf.netWe analyzed Stlf.net page load time and found that the first response time was 251 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
stlf.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value5.8 s
16/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value6.2 s
62/100
10%
251 ms
61 ms
27 ms
34 ms
85 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Stlf.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Stlf.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (67%)
3.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Stlf.net main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stlf needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 67% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 486 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 16.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stlf.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (40%)
42
25
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stlf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stlf.net
251 ms
base.js
61 ms
swfobject.js
27 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
reset.css
85 ms
screen.css
112 ms
posts.css
84 ms
events.css
84 ms
s.gif
333 ms
logo_stlf.png
50 ms
Donate_Button.gif
51 ms
DemandIt_Button.gif
50 ms
leadit.gif
49 ms
btn_find_a_tour.png
51 ms
Charleston_Oysters.JPG
82 ms
atlanta1.jpg
83 ms
bfg-stlf.png
1260 ms
Irene2.jpg
112 ms
SVPlogo_Global_NoWords.png
83 ms
CFC_2ApprovedCharity_2C.gif
135 ms
youthprise_large.png
96 ms
bremer-foundation.jpg
124 ms
CharitiesReviewCouncil.jpg
463 ms
logo-goodshop.jpg
157 ms
Facebook_logo.png
140 ms
Twitter_logo.png
162 ms
youtube.png
161 ms
instagram_logo.png
172 ms
ga.js
8 ms
bg_header.jpg
162 ms
nav_main.png
167 ms
bg_subhead.jpg
205 ms
bg_search_field.png
181 ms
stats_pif.png
227 ms
stats_hours.png
225 ms
stats_part.png
207 ms
bg_home_content.png
232 ms
Post%20It.jpg
285 ms
btn_read_more.png
272 ms
bg_get_connected.jpg
269 ms
get_connected_box.png
271 ms
btn_read_full_article.png
301 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
stlf.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
stlf.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
stlf.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stlf.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Stlf.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stlf.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stlf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: