5.7 sec in total
250 ms
4.3 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Stockover content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stockover.com
StockOver is a supplier of branded clearance homewares. Find the best deals, the best brands at really competitive prices !
Visit stockover.comWe analyzed Stockover.com page load time and found that the first response time was 250 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
stockover.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value17.2 s
0/100
10%
Value3,260 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.426
22/100
15%
Value27.1 s
0/100
10%
250 ms
31 ms
155 ms
184 ms
187 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Stockover.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube-nocookie.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Stockover.com.
Page size can be reduced by 142.3 kB (8%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Stockover.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 882.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stockover images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 73.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stockover.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (70%)
82
25
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stockover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
250 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
155 ms
style.min.css
184 ms
styles.css
187 ms
rs6.css
247 ms
frontend.min.css
274 ms
js_composer.min.css
563 ms
style.css
337 ms
selfie-icons.css
366 ms
selfie-usage.css
427 ms
plugins.css
457 ms
bootstrap.min.css
845 ms
style.css
523 ms
selfie-styles.css
517 ms
style-responsive.css
532 ms
front.bundle.css
760 ms
css
18 ms
1f0b00a0f551182b4b49340e396418b9.source.css
606 ms
frontend.min.js
857 ms
jquery.js
950 ms
rbtools.min.js
659 ms
rs6.min.js
879 ms
css2
46 ms
css
56 ms
front.bundle.js
1020 ms
runtime.bundle.js
1095 ms
scripts.js
935 ms
api.js
56 ms
script.js
1169 ms
jquery.visible.js
1019 ms
prof.common.js
1053 ms
retina.js
1058 ms
scripts-top.js
1059 ms
scripts-bottom.js
1111 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1130 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1443 ms
jquery.sticky.js
1168 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
1346 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
1222 ms
linkid.js
15 ms
collect
32 ms
collect
33 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1475 ms
js
40 ms
gmap-settings.js
1479 ms
script.js
1109 ms
numinate.js
1405 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
1168 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.js
1196 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
1169 ms
jquery.utilcarousel.min.js
1196 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1419 ms
insight.min.js
72 ms
logo.png
891 ms
transparent.png
900 ms
ico-stars.png
728 ms
ico-target.png
713 ms
ico-service.png
973 ms
illus-processus-1.jpg
1008 ms
selfie-process-line1.png
1104 ms
illus-processus-2.jpg
990 ms
selfie-process-line2.png
915 ms
illus-processus-3.jpg
989 ms
illus-processus-4.jpg
1400 ms
Capture-1024x397.jpg
1828 ms
illus-footer.png
1099 ms
illus-footer-portal.jpg
1671 ms
illus-oportunite.jpg
1369 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff
38 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff
124 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff
124 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff
113 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1334 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1336 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1333 ms
recaptcha__en.js
83 ms
ajax-loader.gif
539 ms
overlay.png
540 ms
iframe_api
53 ms
loader.gif
570 ms
www-widgetapi.js
6 ms
tpyOP8cxVDM
85 ms
www-player.css
8 ms
www-embed-player.js
28 ms
base.js
54 ms
UyQhPWNsNa0oRkd8oSQlA6PkpWpORMW0CLBRczdusu0.js
51 ms
embed.js
30 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
216 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
100 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
101 ms
Create
123 ms
GenerateIT
17 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
130 ms
stockover.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
stockover.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
stockover.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stockover.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Stockover.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stockover.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stockover. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: