3.1 sec in total
10 ms
1.3 sec
1.8 sec
Visit strongermoving.com now to see the best up-to-date Stronger Moving content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about strongermoving.com
local movers moving companies
Visit strongermoving.comWe analyzed Strongermoving.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
strongermoving.com performance score
10 ms
68 ms
76 ms
86 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Strongermoving.com, 59% (38 requests) were made to Secureservercdn.net and 25% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (600 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 117.2 kB (14%)
858.9 kB
741.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Strongermoving.com main page is 858.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 643.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stronger Moving images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 54 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 40 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Strongermoving.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (84%)
44
7
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stronger Moving. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.strongermoving.com
10 ms
www.strongermoving.com
68 ms
style.min.css
76 ms
style.min.css
86 ms
css
59 ms
astra-addon-631a0f34ee2545-41013430.css
78 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
79 ms
frontend.min.css
90 ms
post-1309.css
87 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
100 ms
animations.min.css
99 ms
post-1191.css
97 ms
frontend.min.css
102 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
130 ms
wpforms-base.min.css
119 ms
post-870.css
163 ms
modern.css
128 ms
fontawesome.min.css
164 ms
brands.min.css
163 ms
jquery.min.js
184 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
235 ms
style.min.js
237 ms
astra-addon-631a0f34f0df37-55175077.js
236 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
378 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
236 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
403 ms
frontend.min.js
406 ms
core.min.js
405 ms
dialog.min.js
440 ms
waypoints.min.js
439 ms
swiper.min.js
441 ms
share-link.min.js
452 ms
frontend.min.js
454 ms
underscore.min.js
519 ms
wp-util.min.js
489 ms
frontend.min.js
488 ms
lazyload.min.js
516 ms
tti.min.js
111 ms
tccl.min.js
110 ms
analytics.js
526 ms
moving-glass-1.jpg
554 ms
IMG_1773-compressor.jpg
576 ms
2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgzaGW_.woff
274 ms
u-4k0rCzjgs5J7oXnJcM_0kACGMtT-DfrQ.woff
310 ms
eicons.woff
271 ms
wEOzEBbCkc5cO0ejVS8.woff
360 ms
TUZyzwprpvBS1izr_vOECuSZ.woff
393 ms
K2F2fZZcl-9SXwl5F_C4R_OwAArx.woff
440 ms
aWB4m0aacbtDfvq5NKliKYk.woff
440 ms
UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbo55cUQ.woff
440 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
599 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
596 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
598 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
597 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
596 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
598 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
600 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
599 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
600 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
268 ms
frontend-msie.min.css
302 ms
cropped-1565719861992-130x73.png
81 ms
Platinum-winner-2021-best-of-srq-local-removebg-preview-2.png
81 ms
collect
125 ms
strongermoving.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Strongermoving.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Strongermoving.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
strongermoving.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stronger Moving. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: