4.3 sec in total
10 ms
2.9 sec
1.4 sec
Welcome to structural.com homepage info - get ready to check Structural best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about structural.com
Structural is a dynamic people directory and internal opportunity marketplace for enterprises that unlocks potential, saves time, and makes work better.
Visit structural.comWe analyzed Structural.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
structural.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.139
79/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
10 ms
109 ms
58 ms
194 ms
84 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Structural.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to 3279155.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net and 8% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source 3279155.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net.
Page size can be reduced by 254.3 kB (5%)
4.8 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Structural.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 158.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 158.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Structural images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 150 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Structural.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (39%)
66
40
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Structural. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
structural.com
10 ms
www.structural.com
109 ms
jquery-1.7.1.js
58 ms
mjfw_styles.min.css
194 ms
dqi2icz.css
84 ms
js
74 ms
65583584.js
48 ms
layout.min.css
82 ms
current.js
54 ms
project.js
64 ms
project.js
60 ms
v2.js
71 ms
mjfw_main.js
205 ms
3279155.js
101 ms
index.js
91 ms
font-awesome.min.css
27 ms
p.css
24 ms
conversion_async.js
481 ms
factors.js
840 ms
hotjar-908437.js
839 ms
structural-augeo-on-light.png
468 ms
545662365
929 ms
Quote%20Background%202.jpg
1375 ms
ddcd6c08-d198-439b-9618-67450e444dd6.png
840 ms
structural-augeo-on-dark.png
423 ms
Christine_Module.png
736 ms
George_Module.png
735 ms
Sofia_Module.png
578 ms
Haru_Module.png
667 ms
Adriel_Module.png
735 ms
Toni_Module.png
824 ms
Larry_Module.png
881 ms
Bora_Module.png
893 ms
Megan_Module.png
894 ms
quote-bg-1@2x.png
850 ms
Scott%20Dorsey.jpeg
849 ms
Aditya.jpeg
891 ms
Customer_Logos_Single_Line_BW.png
936 ms
Michael%20Wentzien.png
1086 ms
Patrick%20Milan%20Headshot.png
1083 ms
Mark%20Goble.png
939 ms
Quote%20Background%201-1.jpg
1345 ms
Zoom%20Small%20Billboard_2%20copy.jpg
1287 ms
icon-lock.svg
1237 ms
d
399 ms
d
504 ms
d
591 ms
d
592 ms
d
663 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
502 ms
json
895 ms
json
880 ms
insight.min.js
683 ms
Workday4-1500.gif
982 ms
apple-store.png
265 ms
google-play.png
418 ms
Current_Teams_home_profile-1.png
961 ms
Microsoft_Event_W_Structural_logo_highlight.png
962 ms
fb.js
461 ms
leadflows.js
483 ms
3279155.js
627 ms
3279155.js
484 ms
585 ms
modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js
500 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
478 ms
1520298255-5b4b9263b265ae06cf19d572a0bea2a53392fe0a0085e52bcb4bc9905eb43838-d.jpg
496 ms
player.js
548 ms
player.css
500 ms
vuid.min.js
493 ms
309 ms
icon-email.svg
90 ms
visit-data
601 ms
1520298255-5b4b9263b265ae06cf19d572a0bea2a53392fe0a0085e52bcb4bc9905eb43838-d
752 ms
20 ms
structural.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
structural.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
structural.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Structural.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Structural.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
structural.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Structural. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: