Tools & Wizards About Us
studiohair.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

studiohair.net

Studio Hair®Prosthetic Wigs, Toppers And Hair Systems San Francisco – Studio Hair® Prosthetic's - Hand Tied Wigs, Toppers & Hair Augment Pieces F...

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

330 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

174 ms

studiohair.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to studiohair.net homepage info - get ready to check Studio Hair best content right away, or after learning these important things about studiohair.net

Studio Hair® Prosthetic Hand Tied Wigs, Toppers & Hairpieces - San Francisco Wig Salon and store, Human Hair and synthetic Wigs, Hair Augment Pieces and Toppers For Women undergoing cancer treatments,...

Visit studiohair.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Studiohair.net page load time and found that the first response time was 330 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studiohair.net performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,960 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studiohair.net

330 ms

squggle_green.jpg

553 ms

Black-WhiteFace_1.gif

593 ms

buttonE.jpg

369 ms

c.count

89 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Studiohair.net, 9% (1 request) were made to Id410.van.ca.siteprotect.com and 9% (1 request) were made to Id415.van.ca.siteprotect.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (593 ms) relates to the external source Id415.van.ca.siteprotect.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.2 kB (56%)

Content Size

45.3 kB

After Optimization

20.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Studiohair.net main page is 45.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 28.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 28.3 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 17.0 kB
  • After minification 15.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studio Hair images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • Images

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio Hair. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

studiohair.net

studiohair.net

330 ms

squggle_green.jpg

squggle_green.jpg

553 ms

Black-WhiteFace_1.gif

Black-WhiteFace_1.gif

593 ms

buttonE.jpg

buttonE.jpg

369 ms

c.count

c.count

89 ms

button11.jpg

button11.jpg

71 ms

button10.jpg

button10.jpg

141 ms

button9.jpg

button9.jpg

143 ms

button2.jpg

button2.jpg

141 ms

buttonC.jpg

buttonC.jpg

142 ms

buttonB.jpg

buttonB.jpg

143 ms

Accessibility Review

studiohair.net accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

studiohair.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

studiohair.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiohair.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiohair.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

studiohair.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studio Hair. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: