Tools & Wizards About Us
studioxite.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

studioxite.com

Loading...

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

3.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

241 ms

studioxite.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Studioxite content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about studioxite.com

Studioxite : Elevate your brand. Extend Your Reach. Expedite Your Hosting. Enhance Your Website. Responsive mobile friendly designs

Visit studioxite.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studioxite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.3 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studioxite.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.219

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studioxite.com

3256 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

69 ms

2faeeb52556fe0a16b91d3827ace8958.css

323 ms

2faeeb52556fe0a16b91d3827ace8958.css

474 ms

fonts.css

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Studioxite.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Studioxite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (77%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

548.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Studioxite.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 91.3 kB

  • Original 106.5 kB
  • After minification 106.3 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 127.8 kB
  • After minification 123.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studioxite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 780.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 279.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 780.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 942.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 129.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studioxite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 942.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (89%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studioxite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studioxite.com

studioxite.com

3256 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

69 ms

2faeeb52556fe0a16b91d3827ace8958.css

2faeeb52556fe0a16b91d3827ace8958.css

323 ms

2faeeb52556fe0a16b91d3827ace8958.css

2faeeb52556fe0a16b91d3827ace8958.css

474 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

169 ms

css

css

25 ms

3eceb5afefb4011ae069969dcebde231.js

3eceb5afefb4011ae069969dcebde231.js

404 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

80 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

81 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

97 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

117 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

119 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

134 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

153 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

157 ms

wpdialog.min.js

wpdialog.min.js

169 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

189 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

195 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

205 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

269 ms

smartresize.js

smartresize.js

231 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

245 ms

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

268 ms

main.js

main.js

287 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

306 ms

js_composer_front.js

js_composer_front.js

306 ms

shutterstock_2423632301-1920x1242-1920x1242.jpg

shutterstock_2423632301-1920x1242-1920x1242.jpg

283 ms

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

167 ms

zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf

zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf

167 ms

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

168 ms

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

168 ms

osmosis.woff

osmosis.woff

195 ms

Eurostile.woff

Eurostile.woff

287 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

212 ms

default

default

768 ms

Accessibility Review

studioxite.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

studioxite.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

studioxite.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studioxite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Studioxite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studioxite.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studioxite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: