654 ms in total
63 ms
426 ms
165 ms
Click here to check amazing Style Check content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stylecheck.me
Style Check integrates strategy, creative, advertising, analytics, and technology to drive digital marketing innovation and help clients identify and engage their target consumer.
Visit stylecheck.meWe analyzed Stylecheck.me page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 591 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
stylecheck.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
90/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value3.1 s
92/100
10%
Value2,920 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
63 ms
22 ms
40 ms
32 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Stylecheck.me, 6% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (207 ms) relates to the external source Platform.twitter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 103.0 kB (17%)
603.2 kB
500.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Stylecheck.me main page is 603.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 523.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Style Check needs image optimization as it can save up to 84.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stylecheck.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (42%)
31
18
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Style Check. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
stylecheck.me
63 ms
reset.css
22 ms
styles.css
40 ms
css
32 ms
googleAnalytics3.js
37 ms
global.js
69 ms
thickbox-compressed.js
37 ms
module.jquery.validate.js
33 ms
querystring.js
35 ms
widgets.js
85 ms
addthis_widget.js
12 ms
module.jquery.carousel.js
66 ms
icon_phone.gif
102 ms
bg_body.jpg
97 ms
img_headerSeparator.jpg
98 ms
stylecheck_red_logo.png
98 ms
stylechecklogo_3.png
98 ms
bg_homepage-copy-2.jpg
100 ms
test2.jpg
103 ms
social-local-gamification-3.jpg
99 ms
test6.jpg
99 ms
test3.jpg
100 ms
homepage_scroller_btn_prev.jpg
102 ms
homepage_scroller_btn_next.jpg
101 ms
wearshare.jpg
101 ms
li_arrow_big.jpg
101 ms
personalized.jpg
102 ms
iphonepic_2.jpg
103 ms
StyleCheckLogo_grey_small.png
101 ms
email-icon-1.gif
94 ms
widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html
207 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
10 ms
homepage_scroller_icon_on.jpg
11 ms
homepage_scroller_icon_off.jpg
12 ms
SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf
12 ms
stylecheck.me accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
stylecheck.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
stylecheck.me SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stylecheck.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stylecheck.me main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
stylecheck.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Style Check. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: