Tools & Wizards About Us
styledge.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

styledge.in

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

317 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

styledge.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to styledge.in homepage info - get ready to check Styledge best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about styledge.in

Visit styledge.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Styledge.in page load time and found that the first response time was 317 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

styledge.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

styledge.in

317 ms

bootstrap.min.css

304 ms

font-awesome.min.css

133 ms

animate.min.css

197 ms

owl.carousel.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Styledge.in, 7% (5 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (609 ms) belongs to the original domain Styledge.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (29%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Styledge.in main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 82.5 kB

  • Original 91.2 kB
  • After minification 39.8 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.4 kB, which is 56% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.5 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 469.0 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Styledge needs image optimization as it can save up to 469.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 389.7 kB

  • Original 643.1 kB
  • After minification 631.2 kB
  • After compression 253.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.7 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 306.0 kB

  • Original 361.5 kB
  • After minification 353.9 kB
  • After compression 55.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Styledge.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 306.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (42%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Styledge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

styledge.in

styledge.in

317 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

304 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

133 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

197 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

114 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

117 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

225 ms

main.css

main.css

233 ms

jmpress.min.js

jmpress.min.js

192 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

75 ms

blueberry.css

blueberry.css

219 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

321 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

107 ms

js

js

25 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

320 ms

mousescroll.js

mousescroll.js

160 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

160 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

319 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

327 ms

jquery.inview.min.js

jquery.inview.min.js

328 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

319 ms

main.js

main.js

321 ms

jquery.blueberry.js

jquery.blueberry.js

320 ms

css

css

25 ms

logo.png

logo.png

91 ms

pc.jpg

pc.jpg

136 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

138 ms

about-us-infographic.jpg

about-us-infographic.jpg

216 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

90 ms

website.jpg

website.jpg

398 ms

logistics.jpg

logistics.jpg

453 ms

social.jpg

social.jpg

488 ms

delhivery.jpg

delhivery.jpg

137 ms

refiral.jpg

refiral.jpg

211 ms

fedex.jpg

fedex.jpg

210 ms

ccavenue.jpg

ccavenue.jpg

255 ms

roadrunnr.jpg

roadrunnr.jpg

255 ms

payu.jpg

payu.jpg

295 ms

aramex.jpg

aramex.jpg

296 ms

storeya.jpg

storeya.jpg

312 ms

zopim.jpg

zopim.jpg

322 ms

wow.jpg

wow.jpg

322 ms

olark.jpg

olark.jpg

367 ms

citrus.jpg

citrus.jpg

370 ms

1click.png

1click.png

376 ms

printlabel.png

printlabel.png

609 ms

abc.png

abc.png

481 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

432 ms

h.jpg

h.jpg

455 ms

b.jpg

b.jpg

477 ms

f.jpg

f.jpg

608 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

80 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

79 ms

Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

83 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

82 ms

a.jpg

a.jpg

607 ms

c.jpg

c.jpg

540 ms

e.jpg

e.jpg

540 ms

g.jpg

g.jpg

538 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

551 ms

website.jpg

website.jpg

346 ms

delivery.jpg

delivery.jpg

411 ms

marketplace.jpg

marketplace.jpg

321 ms

widget_v2.132.js

widget_v2.132.js

14 ms

common.js

common.js

7 ms

map.js

map.js

28 ms

util.js

util.js

27 ms

marker.js

marker.js

26 ms

SEO Factors

styledge.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Styledge.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Styledge.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

styledge.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Styledge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: