3.7 sec in total
162 ms
2.7 sec
836 ms
Visit sugaring.london now to see the best up-to-date Sugaring content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sugaring.london
Sugaring Hair Removal is the next hair removal trend in London you are going to be obsessed with.Our best therapists are highly trained in the art of sugaring!
Visit sugaring.londonWe analyzed Sugaring.london page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
sugaring.london performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value640 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.987
2/100
15%
Value9.7 s
29/100
10%
162 ms
555 ms
109 ms
184 ms
307 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Sugaring.london, 5% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sugaring.london.
Page size can be reduced by 98.3 kB (3%)
3.0 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Sugaring.london main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugaring images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugaring.london needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.7 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (62%)
84
32
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugaring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sugaring.london
162 ms
sugaring.london
555 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
109 ms
style.min.css
184 ms
style.min.css
307 ms
style.min.css
315 ms
style.min.css
234 ms
style.min.css
236 ms
vendors-style.css
260 ms
style.css
389 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
319 ms
woocommerce.css
320 ms
style.css
331 ms
bootstrap.min.css
398 ms
theme.css
409 ms
styles.css
472 ms
style.css
411 ms
jquery.min.js
491 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
464 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
470 ms
scripts.js
468 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
490 ms
wooptpm.js
540 ms
js
72 ms
player_api
48 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
614 ms
js.cookie.min.js
616 ms
woocommerce.min.js
615 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
617 ms
popper.min.js
617 ms
bootstrap.min.js
665 ms
retina.min.js
666 ms
jquery.sticky.js
665 ms
google-ads.js
665 ms
wp-embed.min.js
664 ms
widget-book-now-2dc89e.js
4 ms
fbevents.js
156 ms
analytics.js
207 ms
gtm.js
152 ms
logo.svg
252 ms
instagram-icon.svg
366 ms
facebook-icon.svg
365 ms
pinterest_logo.svg
363 ms
Tiktok_logo.svg
360 ms
logo_small.svg
363 ms
phone_icon.svg
399 ms
bg.jpg
585 ms
top_bg.png
457 ms
carousel_shape_top.png
456 ms
carousel_shape_bottom.png
456 ms
slide1.jpg
755 ms
slide2.jpg
598 ms
slides_5.jpg
762 ms
slide3.jpg
768 ms
slide4.jpg
768 ms
hero_video_thumbnail.webp
616 ms
play.png
677 ms
homepage_packages.webp
694 ms
ingredients.png
752 ms
about-us.png
848 ms
reviews_bottom_bg.jpg
828 ms
testimonials_shape_top.png
830 ms
review2.png
838 ms
review.png
846 ms
review3.png
956 ms
arrow-left.png
823 ms
arrow-right.png
825 ms
testimonials_shape_bottom.png
833 ms
contacts_bg.jpg
841 ms
www-widgetapi.js
103 ms
270 ms
loader.js
269 ms
phone-icon.png
796 ms
email-icon.png
849 ms
cactus.png
853 ms
christiana.jpg
1016 ms
250 ms
FuturaPTCond-Bold.woff
806 ms
FuturaPTCond-ExtraBold.woff
811 ms
linkid.js
53 ms
ec.js
54 ms
FuturaPT-Book.woff
698 ms
FuturaPTCond-Book.woff
708 ms
sugaring.london
1028 ms
43 ms
call-tracking_7.js
17 ms
collect
21 ms
collect
16 ms
36 ms
js
60 ms
wcm
29 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
85 ms
sugaring.london accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
sugaring.london best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sugaring.london SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugaring.london can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugaring.london main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sugaring.london
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugaring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: