2.1 sec in total
83 ms
2 sec
64 ms
Click here to check amazing Sugar Styling content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sugarstyling.com
Gold Coast professional Property Styling and Home Staging company, specialising in styling homes to make your property desirable, to attract more potential buyers and maximise your sale price. Contact...
Visit sugarstyling.comWe analyzed Sugarstyling.com page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
sugarstyling.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value6.2 s
44/100
10%
Value1,070 ms
24/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
83 ms
51 ms
57 ms
54 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sugarstyling.com, 45% (34 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 33% (25 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 363.4 kB (21%)
1.7 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Sugarstyling.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 360.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 360.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugar Styling images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (22%)
51
40
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugar Styling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sugarstyling.com
83 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
51 ms
minified.js
57 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
54 ms
polyfill.min.js
44 ms
thunderbolt-commons.ec68bee9.bundle.min.js
41 ms
main.f286c407.bundle.min.js
178 ms
lodash.min.js
41 ms
react.production.min.js
40 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
197 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
182 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
182 ms
SS_Logo_Landscape_Black-01.jpg
310 ms
bundle.min.js
156 ms
cadc50_508b118decef4a2382565c7b8c99bc12~mv2.jpg
214 ms
cadc50_5cada0c1dc07455eb984bcfcd7650e28~mv2.jpg
215 ms
cadc50_09455f55a0084c9a8957b64b0eefbfd5~mv2.jpg
291 ms
b96790_5619ce7377b44c33a71fc350a8d1f12d~mv2.jpg
299 ms
b96790_e0f64a625cfd4cafabba0239d137e32a~mv2.jpg
410 ms
b96790_315eb923dd934250baabc1c0aa93ec56~mv2.jpg
443 ms
b96790_3e1e0c453efc4f80a1a07e5b92525ac9~mv2.jpg
443 ms
b96790_531c9b836ad04182bf8467c95c0c5428~mv2.jpg
539 ms
b96790_fc1075c67f5549d7a322642a16a6b1eb~mv2.jpg
560 ms
b96790_1f334bb8ce974b138d2cf7e3c85f23dc~mv2.jpg
495 ms
b96790_9bc83323497b4351a13ebb2ca4dad5e8~mv2.jpg
711 ms
b96790_fb9f2f37bc3c4f528719c77d912d22f3~mv2.jpg
815 ms
b96790_5c7d58a3997b4086b2acb67602c04ad9~mv2.jpg
641 ms
b96790_de796dabfc65413da5e72a6fbf3d4c90~mv2.jpg
772 ms
b96790_95d3d983327347b4a4b3ad33e7930967~mv2.jpg
792 ms
b96790_0a1d42fb3a234c40872fb556d0ad33a9~mv2.jpg
824 ms
b96790_7854386673714dff88c10fcf08539190~mv2.jpg
861 ms
b96790_1de399533ba7471cbb21354714c7bb5e~mv2.jpg
937 ms
b96790_76d1110ee5fc4047b455986ae229205f~mv2.jpg
1012 ms
b96790_dd742c6ea5004e1dbca217cf587f3679~mv2.jpg
1013 ms
b96790_407584fcb603445baef0c705319eb23e~mv2.jpg
1011 ms
b96790_a3bf85b02f1d42d3a51f84acc97b2e2d~mv2.jpg
1179 ms
b96790_86edd3428af9424f80e66beed171190f~mv2.jpg
1129 ms
b96790_945c4030a1ed409e80b8978e7396638e~mv2.jpg
1158 ms
b96790_4bc16f9e3a054ec98f74286642f16a92~mv2.jpg
1303 ms
b96790_708fa237ebc14531b91f30d027c560a4~mv2.jpg
1239 ms
b96790_3082716f4bb74266961ea71b9d1d0ff2~mv2.jpg
1266 ms
b96790_c805ddd06aca4b63b4571cf1bf45b0f1~mv2.jpg
1378 ms
b96790_c303b5f26112422e822172e3246b53ce~mv2_d_3600_2396_s_2.jpg
1529 ms
b96790_0fca3d480633431c8f5ae91133977942~mv2_d_3600_2396_s_2.jpg
1184 ms
Freshwater%2027.jpg
1461 ms
Freshwater%2028.jpg
1518 ms
Freshwater%2031.jpg
1567 ms
tiny_arrows.4355fe50.png
45 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4i1Uw.woff
44 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYi1Uw.woff
44 ms
b36b499f-d776-461c-bacb-fcbebe1cb9b4.woff
46 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
45 ms
80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff
43 ms
c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff
44 ms
192dac76-a6d9-413d-bb74-22308f2e0cc5.woff
47 ms
0a3939d0-3833-4db3-8b85-f64c2b3350d2.woff
47 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
45 ms
97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aWz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
45 ms
9_7S_tWeGDh5Pq3u05RVkj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
45 ms
117 ms
114 ms
112 ms
117 ms
107 ms
113 ms
156 ms
156 ms
154 ms
150 ms
147 ms
148 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
25 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
9 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
sugarstyling.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
sugarstyling.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sugarstyling.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarstyling.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugarstyling.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sugarstyling.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugar Styling. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: