Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

sur.es

SUR, diario de Málaga. Noticias de Malaga

Page Load Speed

18.2 sec in total

First Response

381 ms

Resources Loaded

13.8 sec

Page Rendered

4 sec

sur.es screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sur.es homepage info - get ready to check SUR best content right away, or after learning these important things about sur.es

Sur.es, las noticias de última hora y la actualidad de Málaga. Actualidad, deportes, ocio, planes, clasificados

Visit sur.es

Key Findings

We analyzed Sur.es page load time and found that the first response time was 381 ms and then it took 17.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sur.es performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value14,570 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.153

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sur.es

381 ms

www.diariosur.es

9113 ms

regionales.css

533 ms

sportsdata_main.css

42 ms

vocento.gigya.css

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 199 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sur.es, 25% (49 requests) were made to Diariosur.es and 15% (30 requests) were made to S0.2mdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.1 sec) relates to the external source Diariosur.es.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (60%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Sur.es main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 384.9 kB

  • Original 457.3 kB
  • After minification 388.3 kB
  • After compression 72.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 68.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 384.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 86.1 kB

  • Original 903.3 kB
  • After minification 817.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SUR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB
  • After compression 614.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 485.3 kB

  • Original 591.3 kB
  • After minification 574.5 kB
  • After compression 106.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sur.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 485.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 87 (46%)

Requests Now

189

After Optimization

102

The browser has sent 189 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SUR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 60 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sur.es accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sur.es best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sur.es SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sur.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sur.es main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SUR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: