5.1 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.1 sec
627 ms
Visit surarial.com now to see the best up-to-date Surarial content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about surarial.com
Un viaje maravilloso hasta SurArial
Visit surarial.comWe analyzed Surarial.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
surarial.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.0 s
82/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.146
78/100
15%
Value3.7 s
91/100
10%
1362 ms
521 ms
125 ms
125 ms
126 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Surarial.com, 15% (3 requests) were made to 41.media.tumblr.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to 40.media.tumblr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Surarial.com.
Page size can be reduced by 181.1 kB (41%)
444.8 kB
263.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Surarial.com main page is 444.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 203.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Surarial images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 99.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Surarial.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)
17
7
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Surarial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.surarial.com
1362 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
521 ms
widget.css
125 ms
diggdigg-style.css
125 ms
pagenavi-css.css
126 ms
css
29 ms
style.css
126 ms
jquery.js
190 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
176 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
177 ms
AlpinePhotoTiles_style.css
158 ms
navigation.js
159 ms
AlpinePhotoTiles_script.js
277 ms
tumblr_nqt7t0jhi71qb0bzxo1_250.jpg
130 ms
tumblr_npzc4cPSTv1rgpg31o1_250.jpg
71 ms
tumblr_nquo9dpko91qb0bzxo1_250.jpg
161 ms
tumblr_npxbl8UKTu1rgpg31o1_250.jpg
72 ms
tumblr_nquw1oS2W61qb0bzxo1_250.jpg
71 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
8 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
54 ms
surarial.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
surarial.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
surarial.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Surarial.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Surarial.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
surarial.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Surarial. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: