3.5 sec in total
150 ms
2.5 sec
854 ms
Welcome to sweethomekeeping.com homepage info - get ready to check Sweethomekeeping best content for Philippines right away, or after learning these important things about sweethomekeeping.com
Visit sweethomekeeping.comWe analyzed Sweethomekeeping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
sweethomekeeping.com performance score
150 ms
205 ms
57 ms
52 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 137 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Sweethomekeeping.com, 9% (12 requests) were made to 3.bp.blogspot.com and 9% (12 requests) were made to Feedjit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (534 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 403.6 kB (25%)
1.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Sweethomekeeping.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 987.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sweethomekeeping images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 231.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 231.7 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sweethomekeeping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (61%)
130
51
The browser has sent 130 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sweethomekeeping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sweethomekeeping.com
150 ms
www.sweethomekeeping.com
205 ms
3645911276-widget_css_bundle.css
57 ms
gsearch.css
52 ms
authorization.css
105 ms
show_ads.js
26 ms
stblogger2.js
61 ms
321 ms
a
33 ms
plusone.js
144 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
3226477086-widgets.js
39 ms
jsapi
58 ms
header.png
62 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
53 ms
searchbg.png
58 ms
2.jpg
49 ms
blogger-image-1124196261.jpg
217 ms
icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
54 ms
zrt_lookup.html
193 ms
show_ads_impl.js
80 ms
type_1.png
202 ms
spacer.png
189 ms
1.jpg
78 ms
5.jpg
42 ms
cleaning+shoes.jpg
78 ms
5+pairs+of+shoes.jpg
77 ms
*
56 ms
Angry+Bird.JPG
60 ms
3.jpg
43 ms
person.gif
72 ms
tag.gif
50 ms
comment-link.png
51 ms
Hobos.jpg
176 ms
file0001463612351.jpg
180 ms
puzzle1.jpg
174 ms
Odeon.jpg
174 ms
blogger-image--1946891778.jpg
183 ms
blogger-image-465881796.jpg
186 ms
4.jpg
61 ms
just+for+you.JPG
175 ms
ads
268 ms
osd.js
42 ms
type_1.png
177 ms
ads
264 ms
bullet.png
34 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
23 ms
boxbg.png
23 ms
logo-16.png
21 ms
side-title.png
36 ms
buttons.js
28 ms
ads
193 ms
widgets.js
171 ms
inj_tf.css
73 ms
348 ms
349 ms
type_1.png
37 ms
likebox.php
483 ms
counter_xhtml.js
24 ms
m_js_controller.js
267 ms
abg.js
333 ms
t.php
252 ms
s.gif
249 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
268 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
330 ms
google_top_exp.js
231 ms
footer.png
214 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
398 ms
5479689064008949494
321 ms
209 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
276 ms
clear.gif
121 ms
12365603366062106063
186 ms
favicon
237 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
164 ms
b1_D09100_F2ACAC.png
218 ms
tf.html
158 ms
blank.html
130 ms
overlay.png
147 ms
overlay2.png
199 ms
us.png
200 ms
pk.png
199 ms
ie.png
200 ms
ua.png
273 ms
default+en.css
52 ms
default+en.I.js
131 ms
s
110 ms
x_button_blue2.png
95 ms
navbar.g
145 ms
UThj8VI7Xhd.css
306 ms
FL1kvZ1wVUz.css
361 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
452 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
534 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
478 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
478 ms
dc.js
68 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
76 ms
async-ads.js
63 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
getSegment.php
99 ms
checkOAuth.esi
173 ms
icons_orange.png
175 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
151 ms
arrows-blue.png
174 ms
t.dhj
117 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
47 ms
fastbutton
76 ms
t.dhj
38 ms
postmessageRelay
71 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
44 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
46 ms
cm
66 ms
x35248
224 ms
s-3271.xgi
29 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
59 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
57 ms
hbpix
175 ms
16 ms
18 ms
pixel
28 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
8 ms
xrefid.xgi
14 ms
2981
95 ms
1175556_613827671991156_338928851_n.jpg
277 ms
1150975_613828275324429_950787917_n.jpg
349 ms
11986504_953357724726438_1513128174783405891_n.jpg
389 ms
10409466_10205218205907772_219213688852359117_n.jpg
425 ms
12642723_932383440178963_2239779216726106703_n.jpg
397 ms
940906_10153964652185871_752845262382712382_n.jpg
398 ms
10356763_700444753380255_6617486322832449487_n.jpg
395 ms
11024742_10204648794554494_7941866013569913227_n.jpg
444 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
71 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
72 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
44 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
45 ms
ui
43 ms
sweethomekeeping.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sweethomekeeping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sweethomekeeping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sweethomekeeping.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sweethomekeeping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: