Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

sylpheed.org

Sylpheed E-mail Client Resources

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

113 ms

sylpheed.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sylpheed.org homepage info - get ready to check Sylpheed best content right away, or after learning these important things about sylpheed.org

Visit sylpheed.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Sylpheed.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sylpheed.org performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sylpheed.org

1763 ms

css

25 ms

style.css

155 ms

jquery.js

240 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

163 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Sylpheed.org, 13% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Sylpheed.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.6 kB (62%)

Content Size

166.4 kB

After Optimization

62.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Sylpheed.org main page is 166.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 104.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 6.0 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 17.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sylpheed images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 67.6 kB

  • Original 104.9 kB
  • After minification 104.5 kB
  • After compression 37.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.6 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 36.2 kB
  • After minification 27.1 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sylpheed.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (43%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sylpheed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sylpheed.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

sylpheed.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

sylpheed.org SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sylpheed.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sylpheed.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sylpheed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: