Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

820 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

cocoposts.typepad.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cocoposts.typepad.com now to see the best up-to-date Cocoposts Typepad content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cocoposts.typepad.com

Places, People, Politics and Planning @cocolaboca

Visit cocoposts.typepad.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cocoposts.typepad.com page load time and found that the first response time was 820 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cocoposts.typepad.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.053

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cocoposts.typepad.com

820 ms

bootstrap.min.css

392 ms

bootstrap-bridge.css

242 ms

styles.css

203 ms

jquery.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Cocoposts.typepad.com, 25% (15 requests) were made to Static.typepad.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Typepad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (897 ms) belongs to the original domain Cocoposts.typepad.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 898.2 kB (70%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

388.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Cocoposts.typepad.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 497.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 75.6 kB

  • Original 96.2 kB
  • After minification 89.1 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 62.4 kB

  • Original 268.4 kB
  • After minification 206.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cocoposts Typepad needs image optimization as it can save up to 62.4 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 290.0 kB

  • Original 424.5 kB
  • After minification 420.8 kB
  • After compression 134.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 290.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 470.1 kB

  • Original 497.8 kB
  • After minification 150.5 kB
  • After compression 27.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cocoposts.typepad.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 470.1 kB or 94% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (77%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cocoposts Typepad. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cocoposts.typepad.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

cocoposts.typepad.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cocoposts.typepad.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cocoposts.typepad.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cocoposts.typepad.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cocoposts Typepad. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: