4.5 sec in total
770 ms
3 sec
720 ms
Visit teameffort.org now to see the best up-to-date TEAMeffort content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about teameffort.org
Helping Your Students Connect With Jesus & Make An Impact in the Lives of Others. Check Out The 2024 Summer Locations & Dates.
Visit teameffort.orgWe analyzed Teameffort.org page load time and found that the first response time was 770 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
teameffort.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value43.7 s
0/100
10%
Value68,190 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.246
50/100
15%
Value83.9 s
0/100
10%
770 ms
159 ms
215 ms
188 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Teameffort.org, 21% (14 requests) were made to S1.radiantwebtools.com and 18% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Teameffort.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (15%)
7.4 MB
6.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Teameffort.org main page is 7.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TEAMeffort images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 842.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 842.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Teameffort.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (82%)
57
10
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TEAMeffort. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.teameffort.org
770 ms
font-awesome.min.css
159 ms
jquery.js
215 ms
jquery.cycle2.js
188 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
133 ms
jquery-ui.js
275 ms
jquery-ui.css
84 ms
jquery.ui.selectmenu.js
161 ms
jquery.ui.selectmenu.css
160 ms
jquery.tagit.custom.js
84 ms
jquery.tagit.css
58 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
86 ms
chosen.min.css
56 ms
jsapi
15 ms
tinymce.min.js
246 ms
masonry.min.js
164 ms
main.js
162 ms
style.css
84 ms
aurora.css
200 ms
aurora-modules.css
200 ms
aurora-dialog.css
201 ms
d142105c.js
98 ms
screen.css
127 ms
screen.css
120 ms
banner.js
119 ms
content.css
81 ms
content.js
82 ms
screen.css
120 ms
screen.css
146 ms
main.js
120 ms
screen.css
151 ms
teameffort.css
121 ms
jquery.browser.js
88 ms
slim-10_7.css
7 ms
woff.css
23 ms
css
38 ms
css
41 ms
css
41 ms
css
40 ms
css
41 ms
css
39 ms
css
48 ms
css
49 ms
css
51 ms
css
50 ms
css
51 ms
css
52 ms
ga.js
67 ms
15116790496_62a2d6e6d7_o.jpg
748 ms
te_youthgroupmissiontrips_01.png
118 ms
texas_hurricane_harvey_022.jpg
566 ms
square%202.jpg
1698 ms
square%204.jpg
1364 ms
square%203.jpg
1464 ms
powered_by_radiant.png
135 ms
js
36 ms
BkZwJXYnumPMepfEA344yQ.ttf
43 ms
eFfAHNfFT0YtF77QmRKRj_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
48 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
607 ms
jvx_POxM6YeT6dBBhDfmufesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
60 ms
F5BSMOSf_T8GT2wiqqpj3Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
61 ms
77GwhzeWPpmLIJUaM8KhxJ0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
61 ms
olKH0FADSbBfMAAA==
6 ms
inpage_linkid.js
18 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
collect
46 ms
teameffort.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
teameffort.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
teameffort.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Teameffort.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Teameffort.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
teameffort.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TEAMeffort. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: