5 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.3 sec
534 ms
Visit technoheap.com now to see the best up-to-date Technoheap content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about technoheap.com
Technology updates & Xiaomi News
Visit technoheap.comWe analyzed Technoheap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
technoheap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value7.1 s
6/100
25%
Value5.4 s
57/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.699
7/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
1152 ms
204 ms
284 ms
334 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Technoheap.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Technoheap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 584.1 kB (22%)
2.6 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Technoheap.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 112.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Technoheap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 163.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 163.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 253.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technoheap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 253.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (63%)
59
22
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technoheap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
technoheap.com
1152 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
204 ms
lightbox.css
284 ms
main.min.css
334 ms
css
24 ms
genericons.css
293 ms
animate.min.css
620 ms
jquery.sidr.dark.css
470 ms
owl.carousel.css
460 ms
owl.theme.css
467 ms
owl.transitions.css
458 ms
style.css
675 ms
extra-style.css
541 ms
jetpack.css
753 ms
jquery.js
845 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
595 ms
frontpage.css
686 ms
cwppos-widget.css
746 ms
jquery-ui.css
817 ms
font-awesome.min.css
790 ms
core.min.js
808 ms
widget.min.js
837 ms
mouse.min.js
869 ms
slider.min.js
874 ms
pie-chart.js
913 ms
main.js
913 ms
lightbox.min.js
965 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
53 ms
wpgroho.js
946 ms
masonry.min.js
954 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
1020 ms
waypoints.min.js
1044 ms
jquery.sidr.min.js
1045 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1044 ms
functions.js
1046 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
css
17 ms
default-bg.png
199 ms
close.png
237 ms
loading.gif
217 ms
prev.png
237 ms
next.png
236 ms
small-3307-31542971.png
282 ms
xiaomi-redmi-note-3-1-1342x580.jpg
321 ms
wa-2y7s7a3il9iyz2v68ce5mo.jpg
418 ms
clashOfClans-1600x580.jpg
589 ms
AndroidBag.jpg
1156 ms
download.jpg
344 ms
Clash-of-Clans.jpg
559 ms
xiaomi-mi-tv-2-fhd-official.png
785 ms
Redmi2Xiaomi.jpg
897 ms
descargar-whatsapp-gratis.jpg
592 ms
oneMediaHubIcon.jpeg
841 ms
T1bQ_vB7ZT1R4cSCrK.png
1101 ms
download-21.jpg
746 ms
Genericons.svg
977 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
5 ms
g.gif
127 ms
hovercard.css
86 ms
services.css
87 ms
technoheap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
technoheap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
technoheap.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technoheap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Technoheap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
technoheap.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Technoheap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: