Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 46

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

terminal.ir

راهنمای سفر و گردشگری ترمینال

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

802 ms

terminal.ir screenshot

About Website

Visit terminal.ir now to see the best up-to-date Terminal content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about terminal.ir

راهنمای سفر و گردشگری ، تور و هتل ترمينال

Visit terminal.ir

Key Findings

We analyzed Terminal.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

terminal.ir performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.terminal.ir

1146 ms

style.css

214 ms

fix.css

206 ms

style.css

247 ms

dashicons.min.css

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 147 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (144 requests) were addressed to the original Terminal.ir, 1% (1 request) were made to Webgozar.ir and 1% (1 request) were made to Webgozar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Terminal.ir.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 464.1 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

958.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Terminal.ir main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 877.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 162.4 kB

  • Original 187.6 kB
  • After minification 180.7 kB
  • After compression 25.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 66.6 kB

  • Original 877.8 kB
  • After minification 811.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Terminal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 152.2 kB

  • Original 233.6 kB
  • After minification 232.6 kB
  • After compression 81.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 152.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 82.9 kB

  • Original 123.9 kB
  • After minification 108.2 kB
  • After compression 41.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Terminal.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (12%)

Requests Now

146

After Optimization

129

The browser has sent 146 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Terminal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

terminal.ir accessibility score

46

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

terminal.ir best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

terminal.ir SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Terminal.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Terminal.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Terminal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: