Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

testbirds.com

Home of Crowdtesting: UX & Usability Testing | QA & Functional Testing

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

269 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

360 ms

testbirds.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Testbirds content for Kenya. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about testbirds.com

QA and UX software crowdtesting from Testbirds. Use people-power to optimize your digital products. Real users. Real devices. Real impact.

Visit testbirds.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Testbirds.com page load time and found that the first response time was 269 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

testbirds.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,880 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

testbirds.com

269 ms

www.testbirds.com

452 ms

merged-4f059d5e4db34636b206b151615cb32e-a1a84807e31a8aaf276a67702ed3db9c.css.gzip

170 ms

merged-49d445a0b2601a1a93192dfdd6481068-125d28221b49f61e2b36b685b061ad61.js.gzip

507 ms

analytics.js

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Testbirds.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (967 ms) belongs to the original domain Testbirds.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 927.2 kB (64%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

514.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Testbirds.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 934.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 43.3 kB
  • After minification 39.3 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 298.4 kB
  • After minification 295.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Testbirds images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 751.3 kB

  • Original 934.1 kB
  • After minification 639.0 kB
  • After compression 182.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 751.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 137.6 kB

  • Original 165.5 kB
  • After minification 162.5 kB
  • After compression 27.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testbirds.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 137.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Testbirds. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

testbirds.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

testbirds.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

testbirds.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testbirds.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testbirds.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Testbirds. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: