4 sec in total
387 ms
3.1 sec
478 ms
Visit testfee.de now to see the best up-to-date Testfee content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about testfee.de
Babysachen ✓ Haushaltsgeräte ✓ Küchengeräte im Test 2017 ➤ auf testfee.de! Jetzt Testsieger vergleichen und Kundenmeinungen lesen!
Visit testfee.deWe analyzed Testfee.de page load time and found that the first response time was 387 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
testfee.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value440 ms
64/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
79/100
10%
387 ms
212 ms
34 ms
207 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Testfee.de, 5% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Testfee.de.
Page size can be reduced by 168.0 kB (13%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Testfee.de main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 98.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Testfee images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testfee.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (40%)
75
45
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Testfee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
testfee.de
387 ms
screen.min.css
212 ms
style.css
34 ms
skin.css
207 ms
css
51 ms
app.css
23 ms
responsive.dataTables.min.css
198 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
208 ms
post-ratings.css
221 ms
tablepress-responsive-flip.min.css
281 ms
jquery.js
555 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
389 ms
widgets_controller.js
401 ms
jay.css
483 ms
jay.js
412 ms
jquery.galleryview-3.0.css
471 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
402 ms
jquery.timers-1.2.js
581 ms
jquery.galleryview-3.0.min.js
678 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.9.custom.css
683 ms
aadsbygoogle.js
45 ms
si_captcha.js
661 ms
cookiechoices.js
606 ms
core.min.js
709 ms
widget.min.js
602 ms
tabs.min.js
787 ms
accordion.min.js
831 ms
front.min.js
799 ms
tie-scripts.js
969 ms
ilightbox.packed.js
640 ms
q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js
816 ms
post-ratings.js
880 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1019 ms
search.js
1021 ms
ga.js
26 ms
ns.html
26 ms
body-bg7.png
481 ms
testfee.png
450 ms
n%C3%A4hmaschinenlogo.png
533 ms
k%C3%BCchenmaschinenlogo.png
631 ms
Espressokocherlogo.png
624 ms
standmixerlogo.png
635 ms
entsafterlogo.png
662 ms
Kapselmaschinelogo.png
842 ms
kombilogo.png
887 ms
buggylogo.png
905 ms
kinderfahrradanh%C3%A4ngerlogo.png
642 ms
kindersitzlogo.png
924 ms
babywippenlogo.png
925 ms
babybettenlogo.png
927 ms
babytragelogo.png
1139 ms
babyphonelogo.png
1174 ms
hochstuhlogo.png
1176 ms
laufgitterlogo.png
1191 ms
milchpumpenlogo.png
939 ms
babyjoggerlogo.png
1277 ms
babypuppenlogo.png
1216 ms
lauflogo.png
1503 ms
kinderkeyboardlogo.png
1456 ms
puzzlemattelogo.png
1539 ms
kindertabletlogo.png
1455 ms
gtm.js
64 ms
inlineskateslogo.png
1486 ms
ns.html
80 ms
kinderrollerlogo.png
1473 ms
gtm.js
41 ms
SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf
50 ms
SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf
67 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1709 ms
googlelogo_color_150x54dp.png
55 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
1560 ms
kinderfahrradlogo.png
1671 ms
einsteiger-keyboardslogo.png
1584 ms
babylike.jpg
1335 ms
SCD580-70x70.jpg
1385 ms
MUm5-70x70.jpg
1341 ms
Capri-70x70.jpg
1395 ms
myjunior1-70x70.jpg
1476 ms
Philips-Avent-SCD560-70x70.jpg
1463 ms
MUM56340-70x70.jpg
1494 ms
safety-1st-70x70.jpg
1468 ms
body-bg4.png
1410 ms
home.png
1412 ms
star.png
1462 ms
stripe.png
1478 ms
testfee.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
testfee.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
testfee.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testfee.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testfee.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
testfee.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Testfee. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: