Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

texteditors.org

TextEditors Wiki: HomePage

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

973 ms

Page Rendered

364 ms

texteditors.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to texteditors.org homepage info - get ready to check Text Editors best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about texteditors.org

A website about selecting and classifying text editors used in programming systems. These are the programming text editors such as Emacs, VI, Multiedit, slick, Slickedit, ISPF, Notepad, VI and VIM tha...

Visit texteditors.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Texteditors.org page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

texteditors.org performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wiki.pl

183 ms

wiki.css

65 ms

show_ads.js

6 ms

ca-pub-9288685682436364.js

52 ms

zrt_lookup.html

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Texteditors.org, 24% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 24% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (239 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.5 kB (29%)

Content Size

46.6 kB

After Optimization

33.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Texteditors.org main page is 46.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 18.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 18.0 kB
  • After minification 18.0 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 624 B

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 13.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Text Editors images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 150 B

  • Original 14.7 kB
  • After minification 14.6 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 88 B

  • Original 223 B
  • After minification 189 B
  • After compression 135 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texteditors.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88 B or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (33%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Text Editors. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

texteditors.org accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

texteditors.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

texteditors.org SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texteditors.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Texteditors.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Text Editors. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: