2.6 sec in total
605 ms
1.3 sec
682 ms
Visit textfac.es now to see the best up-to-date Text Fac content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about textfac.es
Textfaces - Lenny face ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), shrug face ¯\_(ツ)_/¯, dongers, and look of disapproval ಠ_ಠ. Click to copy, no need to highlight!
Visit textfac.esWe analyzed Textfac.es page load time and found that the first response time was 605 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
textfac.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value3,480 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.41
24/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
605 ms
29 ms
74 ms
28 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Textfac.es, 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (605 ms) belongs to the original domain Textfac.es.
Page size can be reduced by 387.7 kB (47%)
821.6 kB
433.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Textfac.es main page is 821.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 297.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Text Fac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 138.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.2 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 189.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textfac.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 189.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (61%)
51
20
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Text Fac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
textfac.es
605 ms
cloudflare.min.js
29 ms
bootstrap.min.css
74 ms
material-wfont.css
28 ms
ripples.css
33 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
32 ms
main.css
50 ms
shirt.css
45 ms
adsbygoogle.js
53 ms
jquery.min.js
67 ms
bootstrap.min.js
55 ms
material.min.js
213 ms
jquery.nouislider.min.js
40 ms
ripples.js
40 ms
snackbar.min.js
39 ms
jquery.cookie.js
39 ms
ZeroClipboard.js
48 ms
maps.js
47 ms
textgags.js
47 ms
tshirt.js
49 ms
main.js
46 ms
faq.js
48 ms
css
44 ms
ga.js
208 ms
background.png
206 ms
sdk.js
210 ms
widgets.js
208 ms
favicon.png
175 ms
shrug_shirt.png
177 ms
disapproval_shirt.png
175 ms
lenny_shirt.png
176 ms
ca-pub-3510139642126584.js
153 ms
zrt_lookup.html
251 ms
show_ads_impl.js
146 ms
dc.js
243 ms
bag2
166 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
120 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
169 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
172 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
171 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
171 ms
__utm.gif
154 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
206 ms
__utm.gif
121 ms
164 ms
ads
156 ms
xd_arbiter.php
102 ms
xd_arbiter.php
164 ms
osd.js
54 ms
ads
134 ms
collect
67 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
47 ms
m_js_controller.js
46 ms
abg.js
69 ms
favicon
64 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
47 ms
favicon
73 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
44 ms
s
32 ms
x_button_blue2.png
16 ms
7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js
28 ms
textfac.es accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
textfac.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
textfac.es SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textfac.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textfac.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
textfac.es
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Text Fac. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: