33.7 sec in total
14.4 sec
18.9 sec
389 ms
Visit textlocal.in now to see the best up-to-date Textlocal content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about textlocal.in
Send Instant OTPs, Alerts & Smarter Bulk SMS Offers via Web Portal, APIs, or Plugins. Easily Receive SMS Online. Trusted by 225,000+ Businesses. Rated 4.8/5
Visit textlocal.inWe analyzed Textlocal.in page load time and found that the first response time was 14.4 sec and then it took 19.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
textlocal.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value19.5 s
0/100
25%
Value14.2 s
1/100
10%
Value4,610 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value20.9 s
1/100
10%
14401 ms
136 ms
720 ms
31 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Textlocal.in, 11% (6 requests) were made to and 4% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Textlocal.in.
Page size can be reduced by 291.6 kB (46%)
634.0 kB
342.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Textlocal.in main page is 634.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 250.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Textlocal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 165.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 165.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textlocal.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (42%)
43
25
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textlocal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
textlocal.in
14401 ms
olp4zrh.js
136 ms
layout.css
720 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
conversion.js
14 ms
hero-home-v2.css
758 ms
d
239 ms
j.php
15 ms
logo.svg
519 ms
iphone.png
765 ms
slide1.png
528 ms
logo-title-point-spacer.png
524 ms
usw.png
526 ms
barclays-capital.png
1501 ms
pizza-hut.png
1267 ms
logo-groupon.png
1047 ms
logo-unilever.png
1116 ms
greenpeace.png
1243 ms
awards-tech-track.png
1538 ms
media-momentum-award-2013-alt.jpg
1797 ms
dma-award-alt.jpg
1880 ms
awards-deloitte-fast-50-alt.jpg
2004 ms
footer-app.png
2052 ms
analytics.js
11 ms
91 ms
v.gif
52 ms
collect
26 ms
hero-home-v2.min.js
1943 ms
wLYdi7UwAA
15 ms
Ath2LtTAAA=
15 ms
8C2HYu1MAAA==
16 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
3562 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3260 ms
8C2HYu1MAAA==
14 ms
8C2HYu1MAAA==
13 ms
Ath2LtTAAA=
11 ms
review-arrow-left.png
2302 ms
logo-title-point.png
2427 ms
collect
185 ms
172 ms
logo-small.svg
2290 ms
dax-webfont.svg
2458 ms
dax-webfont.woff
2888 ms
p.gif
121 ms
interface.min.js
2756 ms
ga-audiences
21 ms
jquery.autocomplete.min.js
519 ms
7ca9cead-f681-4848-873e-a5d6e0b238ea.js
135 ms
social-media-tabs.css
581 ms
buttons.js
7 ms
ServiceGetConfig
273 ms
blank.gif
12 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
42 ms
textlocal.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
textlocal.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
textlocal.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textlocal.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textlocal.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
textlocal.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Textlocal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: