3.5 sec in total
379 ms
3 sec
157 ms
Welcome to textview.jp homepage info - get ready to check Textview best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about textview.jp
変わりつづける。学びつづける。新しい自分に出会うための1ページ。
Visit textview.jpWe analyzed Textview.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 379 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
textview.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value66.1 s
0/100
25%
Value33.8 s
0/100
10%
Value6,610 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value54.2 s
0/100
10%
379 ms
149 ms
294 ms
295 ms
445 ms
Our browser made a total of 119 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Textview.jp, 6% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Textview.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 250.1 kB (37%)
682.3 kB
432.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Textview.jp main page is 682.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 315.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Textview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 163.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 163.0 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textview.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (54%)
117
54
The browser has sent 117 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
textview.jp
379 ms
style.css
149 ms
wp-autopagerize.css
294 ms
wpp.css
295 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
445 ms
main.js
304 ms
gistfile1.js
313 ms
jquery.rollover.js
313 ms
jquery.cookie.js
469 ms
imp
301 ms
imp
305 ms
wp-autopagerize.js
484 ms
imp
189 ms
plusone.js
69 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
198 ms
site_logo.jpg
198 ms
ashita_156x45.gif
236 ms
68272402016_p038_01-350x226.jpg
463 ms
09189022016_p040_01-350x226.jpg
336 ms
16501022016_p025_02-350x226.jpg
460 ms
68272402016_p012_01-350x226.jpg
594 ms
pickup_banner.png
301 ms
c_items.gif
376 ms
c_rss.jpg
511 ms
16501022016_p030_01-67x67.jpg
512 ms
c_items_new.gif
533 ms
68272402016_p038_01-67x67.jpg
593 ms
09189022016_p040_01-67x67.jpg
613 ms
16501022016_p025_02-67x67.jpg
629 ms
68272402016_p019_01-67x67.jpg
653 ms
6223059-47x67.jpg
689 ms
68272402016_p012_01-67x67.jpg
751 ms
12039022016_p080_01-67x67.jpg
751 ms
09189022016_p000_01-67x67.jpg
762 ms
16501022016_p023_01-67x67.jpg
774 ms
nextpagebtn.gif
831 ms
c_page_top.gif
850 ms
sb_ranking.gif
898 ms
44d085a2504657d9663e50c0261ce1fe.gif
896 ms
sokutei300.gif
915 ms
0039577.jpg
920 ms
sb_book_more_text.gif
965 ms
6407216.jpg
1005 ms
f_logo.gif
1041 ms
f_poricy.gif
1042 ms
f_link_2.gif
1064 ms
f_link_1.gif
1065 ms
gtm.js
68 ms
all.js
135 ms
show_ads.js
8 ms
sync
6 ms
ca-pub-3738484339801783.js
62 ms
zrt_lookup.html
95 ms
show_ads_impl.js
58 ms
h_navi_1.gif
1094 ms
h_navi_2.gif
1134 ms
h_navi_3.gif
1159 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
68 ms
ads
222 ms
analytics.js
16 ms
search_tool_n1.js
770 ms
Rtoaster.js
680 ms
osd.js
57 ms
ads
296 ms
collect
42 ms
collect
105 ms
h_navi_4.gif
994 ms
ads
174 ms
126 ms
h_navi_5.gif
984 ms
h_navi_7.gif
980 ms
xd_arbiter.php
60 ms
xd_arbiter.php
135 ms
h_gb.gif
979 ms
15622621089594723431
124 ms
abg.js
61 ms
m_js_controller.js
56 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
96 ms
c_search_btn.gif
983 ms
sa_navi_17.gif
950 ms
s
48 ms
x_button_blue2.png
24 ms
3784097529959671136
11 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
7 ms
sa_navi_1.gif
875 ms
sa_navi_2.gif
896 ms
sa_navi_3.gif
857 ms
sa_navi_5.gif
926 ms
sa_navi_6.gif
945 ms
sa_navi_7.gif
887 ms
sa_navi_8.gif
890 ms
sa_navi_9.gif
895 ms
sa_navi_10.gif
889 ms
sa_navi_11.gif
942 ms
sa_navi_12.gif
945 ms
sa_navi_13.gif
875 ms
sa_navi_14.gif
875 ms
sa_navi_15.gif
890 ms
sa_navi_16.gif
893 ms
168 ms
topics_bg_b.gif
918 ms
c_items_line.gif
921 ms
i_search_assist_n1.js
370 ms
ac.css
351 ms
sb_ranking_line.gif
874 ms
sb_ranking_1.gif
889 ms
sb_ranking_2.gif
883 ms
sb_ranking_3.gif
896 ms
sb_ranking_4.gif
939 ms
sb_ranking_5.gif
910 ms
nextpagebtn_on.gif
875 ms
h_navi_1_on.gif
901 ms
h_navi_out.gif
879 ms
search_bg.gif
900 ms
topics_bg_a.gif
941 ms
activeview
15 ms
activeview
20 ms
ui
33 ms
xd_arbiter.php
38 ms
textview.jp accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
textview.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
textview.jp SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textview.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textview.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
textview.jp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Textview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: