4.8 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.1 sec
319 ms
Click here to check amazing Think Taylor content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thinktaylor.com
Helping businesses and professionals to brand their web presence, build effective social media strategies, and find their voice.
Visit thinktaylor.comWe analyzed Thinktaylor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
thinktaylor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.062
97/100
15%
Value5.2 s
75/100
10%
1426 ms
247 ms
256 ms
219 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Thinktaylor.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Thinktaylor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 741.2 kB (59%)
1.3 MB
513.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Thinktaylor.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 431.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Think Taylor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 334.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 334.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 345.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thinktaylor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 345.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (64%)
33
12
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Think Taylor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thinktaylor.com
1426 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
247 ms
styles.css
256 ms
style.css
219 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
399 ms
shortcodes.css
349 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
329 ms
jetpack.css
418 ms
contest.css
376 ms
jquery.js
761 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
663 ms
optin.js
462 ms
jquery.form.min.js
107 ms
scripts.js
131 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
116 ms
waypoints.min.js
172 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
206 ms
custom.js
256 ms
smoothscroll.js
192 ms
imagesloaded.js
228 ms
masonry.js
248 ms
e-201611.js
8 ms
Logo-333x58.jpg
472 ms
LogoMediaActivist-Floa-362-54t.jpg
130 ms
Logo-Words-Image1.png
397 ms
Logo.png
1222 ms
background-blue.jpg
233 ms
Puffing-Cigar.jpg
190 ms
confessions-of-a-scholarship-winner-324x250.jpg
152 ms
Stop-Teaching-Our-Kids-to-Kill1-319x250.jpg
141 ms
REading-Challenge-2015-400x250.png
1216 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
13 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTeY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
13 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzOY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
56 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-huY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
56 ms
ETmodules_v2.ttf
535 ms
g.gif
33 ms
thinktaylor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thinktaylor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
thinktaylor.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thinktaylor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thinktaylor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thinktaylor.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Think Taylor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: