10.7 sec in total
4.1 sec
6.3 sec
277 ms
Click here to check amazing Thisreview content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thisreview.com
thisreview.com.au provides consumer submitted reviews on products and local businesses providing services in Australia.
Visit thisreview.comWe analyzed Thisreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.1 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
thisreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.9 s
89/100
10%
4099 ms
352 ms
297 ms
7 ms
7 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Thisreview.com, 54% (20 requests) were made to Thisreview.com.au and 11% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Thisreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 67.4 kB (46%)
147.4 kB
80.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Thisreview.com main page is 147.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 72.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 895 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thisreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 30.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thisreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (75%)
36
9
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thisreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
thisreview.com
4099 ms
tr.css
352 ms
ajax.js
297 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
quant.js
7 ms
logo.gif
653 ms
tabuwe.gif
190 ms
tabuea.gif
296 ms
mainnw.gif
360 ms
mainno.gif
361 ms
mainne.gif
361 ms
mainbg.gif
366 ms
3
1094 ms
3
943 ms
3
1272 ms
3
1317 ms
3
1337 ms
3
1392 ms
3
1816 ms
3
1810 ms
zrt_lookup.html
36 ms
show_ads_impl.js
43 ms
ads
234 ms
mainsw.gif
1261 ms
mainso.gif
1313 ms
mainse.gif
1309 ms
osd.js
49 ms
pixel;r=1523473762;a=p-5addUxV7kD8tQ;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1441210910-1458491906081;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458491906081;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthisreview.com%2F;ogl=
42 ms
ga.js
15 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
2941310925630094027
70 ms
abg.js
32 ms
m_js_controller.js
49 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
68 ms
s
22 ms
x_button_blue2.png
21 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
3 ms
thisreview.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
thisreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
thisreview.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thisreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Thisreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thisreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thisreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: