4.3 sec in total
857 ms
2.9 sec
524 ms
Welcome to thomasgredig.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomasgredig best content right away, or after learning these important things about thomasgredig.com
Physics, R programming, and other bits for reproducible research
Visit thomasgredig.comWe analyzed Thomasgredig.com page load time and found that the first response time was 857 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
thomasgredig.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value2.8 s
82/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.8 s
97/100
10%
857 ms
134 ms
281 ms
144 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Thomasgredig.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (857 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomasgredig.com.
Page size can be reduced by 333.4 kB (40%)
835.4 kB
502.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomasgredig.com main page is 835.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 378.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.8 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomasgredig images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 241.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 241.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomasgredig.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (50%)
28
14
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomasgredig. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
857 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
134 ms
virtue.css
281 ms
default.css
144 ms
css
24 ms
jetpack.css
175 ms
jquery.js
250 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
157 ms
modernizr.min.js
238 ms
google_analytics_auto.js
238 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
masonry.min.js
241 ms
plugins-min.js
405 ms
main.js
404 ms
wp-embed.min.js
403 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
ga.js
59 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-02-19-at-09.56.36-360x360.png
399 ms
econScatter10-360x360.png
399 ms
post_standard.jpg
396 ms
HHCF-360x360.png
402 ms
JabRef-360x360.png
397 ms
IMG_0113-360x360.jpg
392 ms
loader.gif
398 ms
tornado-fatalities-2-370x370.png
399 ms
tornado-timeline-370x370.png
398 ms
1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
354 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
361 ms
__utm.gif
325 ms
slide_direction.png
107 ms
g.gif
22 ms
thomasgredig.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
thomasgredig.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
thomasgredig.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomasgredig.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomasgredig.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomasgredig.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomasgredig. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: