Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

tidelift.com

Tidelift | Reduce security risk from bad open source packages

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

21 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

3.7 sec

tidelift.com screenshot

About Website

Visit tidelift.com now to see the best up-to-date Tidelift content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tidelift.com

Reduce security risk from bad open source packages and ensure the packages you rely on keep getting better.

Visit tidelift.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tidelift.com page load time and found that the first response time was 21 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tidelift.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value55,880 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.354

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value76.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tidelift.com

21 ms

tidelift.com

528 ms

module_37411489172_Two_column_flex_content.min.css

137 ms

module_44722519191_Image_Only_Flex-boxes-multi-columns.min.css

182 ms

module_83163141754_Q3_2022_Home_Animation.min.css

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Tidelift.com, 46% (43 requests) were made to 4008838.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net and 9% (8 requests) were made to Cdn2.hubspot.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source 4008838.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 651.6 kB (28%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Tidelift.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 125.4 kB

  • Original 148.5 kB
  • After minification 137.1 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 423.3 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tidelift needs image optimization as it can save up to 423.3 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 87.3 kB

  • Original 157.0 kB
  • After minification 157.0 kB
  • After compression 69.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.3 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 37.4 kB
  • After minification 37.3 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tidelift.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (49%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tidelift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tidelift.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tidelift.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

tidelift.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tidelift.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tidelift.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tidelift. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: