9.7 sec in total
31 ms
8.9 sec
776 ms
Welcome to trak.in homepage info - get ready to check Trak best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about trak.in
Visit trak.inWe analyzed Trak.in page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
trak.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
16/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value9.5 s
11/100
10%
Value6,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.157
74/100
15%
Value18.8 s
3/100
10%
31 ms
823 ms
673 ms
1139 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Trak.in, 9% (9 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 7% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) belongs to the original domain Trak.in.
Page size can be reduced by 864.0 kB (13%)
6.8 MB
6.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Trak.in main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 167.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 167.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 389.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trak images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 306.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 306.6 kB or 32% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trak.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (40%)
86
52
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
trak.in
31 ms
trak.in
823 ms
stories
673 ms
1139 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
54 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
710 ms
jquery-3.6.3.min.js
66 ms
awesome-css
54 ms
all-js
1284 ms
master.1103.min.js
80 ms
load.sumome.com
66 ms
adsbygoogle.js
155 ms
amp-auto-ads-0.1.js
66 ms
js
91 ms
sumome.js
9 ms
e-202418.js
13 ms
vedd3670a3b1c4e178fdfb0cc912d969e1713874337387
59 ms
ga.js
21 ms
launchpad.1103.min.js
85 ms
gpt.js
213 ms
Trak.in-final-logo.svg
69 ms
search-icon.svg
693 ms
ify-12.png
681 ms
Adani-1280x720-1-1.jpeg
83 ms
WFHWFH-1280x720-1-1024x576-2.jpeg
687 ms
ify-13.png
764 ms
Untitled-design-33.jpg
766 ms
Cognizant-bldg-1024x576-1.jpg
1367 ms
Untitled-design-29-1280x720-1024x576-1-1280x720-1-300x169.jpg
1405 ms
Untitled-design-8-1-300x140.jpg
1407 ms
Untitled-design-4-8-1280x720-1024x576-1-1280x720-1-300x169.jpg
1405 ms
Untitled-design-31-1280x720-1-1024x576-1-300x169.jpg
1757 ms
Screenshot-2024-04-14-at-7.03.07%E2%80%AFAM-1-300x141.png
1934 ms
Untitled-design-7-1280x720-1-1-300x169.jpeg
1970 ms
Screenshot-2024-04-28-at-7.21.10%E2%80%AFAM-300x139.png
2557 ms
facebook.svg
2050 ms
twitter.svg
2098 ms
whatsapp-img.svg
2462 ms
linkedin.svg
1935 ms
youtube.svg
1936 ms
rss.svg
1944 ms
Untitled-design-8-6.png
2614 ms
ify-11.png
3804 ms
Untitled-design-4-1.png
2742 ms
5C278C3B-761B-420F-93B9-E88AFAE33087.jpeg
2798 ms
ify-8.png
4263 ms
Untitled-design-11.png
3238 ms
Untitled-design-8-1.jpg
3298 ms
Untitled-design-1-1-1280x720-1-1024x576-1-1024x576-1.png
4596 ms
Untitled-design-31-1280x720-1-1024x576-1.jpg
3459 ms
Untitled-design-4-8-1280x720-1024x576-1-1280x720-1.jpg
3906 ms
Untitled-design-4-1.png
3974 ms
Untitled-design-3-12-1-1-1280x720-1.jpeg
4133 ms
Trak.in-final-logo-footer.svg
4491 ms
__utm.gif
73 ms
show_ads_impl.js
273 ms
izooto.js
83 ms
4.png
81 ms
pubads_impl.js
87 ms
categories-2.png
4298 ms
categories-4.png
4382 ms
categories-5.png
4535 ms
zrt_lookup.html
152 ms
ads
486 ms
categories-4-1.png
4886 ms
spa.v3.min.js
293 ms
categories-3.png
4975 ms
ads
440 ms
ads
302 ms
ads
519 ms
ads
460 ms
ads
593 ms
ads
402 ms
12749451777203328861
57 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
56 ms
abg_lite.js
171 ms
window_focus.js
44 ms
cookie_push_onload.html
17 ms
qs_click_protection.js
42 ms
ufs_web_display.js
58 ms
bbcd6bf18c20baa1b2adeb195de9b551.js
56 ms
icon.png
16 ms
gp_match
222 ms
pixel
78 ms
pixel
59 ms
pixel
60 ms
pixel
58 ms
pixel
24 ms
pixel
21 ms
activeview
87 ms
WGg91BhL6Bhk3qTAPqmblqNZdzujbVjDoJfr3h8Q3EY.js
5 ms
pixel
19 ms
sodar
5 ms
rum
3 ms
rum
1 ms
trak.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
trak.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
trak.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trak.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trak.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
trak.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: