4.8 sec in total
1.5 sec
3.2 sec
149 ms
Visit transhiva.com now to see the best up-to-date Transhiva content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about transhiva.com
transhiva.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, transhiva.com has it all. We hope you find...
Visit transhiva.comWe analyzed Transhiva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
transhiva.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value22.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value1,610 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.17
70/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
1457 ms
456 ms
92 ms
138 ms
166 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Transhiva.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to S9.mylivechat.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Transhiva.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (44%)
2.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Transhiva.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. This web page is already compressed.
Potential reduce by 512.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Transhiva needs image optimization as it can save up to 512.4 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 493.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 493.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 277.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Transhiva.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 277.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (56%)
54
24
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Transhiva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
transhiva.com
1457 ms
bootstrap.min.css
456 ms
theme.css
92 ms
bootstrap-reset.css
138 ms
font-awesome.css
166 ms
flexslider.css
108 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
106 ms
animate.css
556 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
580 ms
style-responsive.css
545 ms
chatinline.aspx
170 ms
jquery-1.11.1.js
931 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
655 ms
bootstrap.min.js
654 ms
hover-dropdown.js
698 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
669 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
934 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
665 ms
wow.min.js
717 ms
owl.carousel.js
867 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
719 ms
link-hover.js
826 ms
common-scripts.js
786 ms
livechat2.aspx
177 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
cse.js
103 ms
Transhiva-Logo.png
224 ms
clients-login.png
269 ms
ph.gif
303 ms
upload-icon.png
318 ms
Transhiva.jpg
967 ms
Get-Quote.png
352 ms
Upload-File.png
467 ms
Project-Execution.png
470 ms
Final-Delivery.png
480 ms
Translation.png
707 ms
Transcription.png
716 ms
Subtitling.png
751 ms
Database%20Creation.png
708 ms
Virtual%20Assistance.png
710 ms
Why-Transhiva.png
1139 ms
C1.png
868 ms
C3.png
932 ms
C5.png
927 ms
C6.png
970 ms
Transhiva-Trust.png
939 ms
ccavenue.png
1036 ms
chatinline.css
67 ms
resources2.aspx
118 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
976 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
954 ms
collect
29 ms
jsapi
28 ms
collect
81 ms
default+en.css
9 ms
default.css
20 ms
default+en.I.js
21 ms
default.css
48 ms
livechatinit2.js
49 ms
ga-audiences
45 ms
transhiva.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
transhiva.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
transhiva.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Transhiva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Transhiva.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
transhiva.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Transhiva. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: