4.3 sec in total
289 ms
3.4 sec
529 ms
Welcome to engelmann.uni.lu homepage info - get ready to check Engelmann Uni best content for Luxembourg right away, or after learning these important things about engelmann.uni.lu
Visit engelmann.uni.lu
We analyzed Engelmann.uni.lu page load time and found that the first response time was 289 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
engelmann.uni.lu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
29/100
10%
289 ms
1339 ms
148 ms
205 ms
176 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Engelmann.uni.lu, 73% (72 requests) were made to Infolux.uni.lu and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Infolux.uni.lu.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (67%)
2.7 MB
874.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Engelmann.uni.lu main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Engelmann Uni images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 568.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 568.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Engelmann.uni.lu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (77%)
88
20
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engelmann Uni. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
engelmann.uni.lu
289 ms
infolux.uni.lu
1339 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
148 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
205 ms
styles.css
176 ms
settings.css
171 ms
css
27 ms
dashicons.min.css
257 ms
thickbox.css
173 ms
front.css
229 ms
share-svg.css
347 ms
css
36 ms
css
46 ms
css
48 ms
main.min.css
524 ms
font-awesome.min.css
284 ms
custom-8ca6f8b824.css
490 ms
media.min.css
337 ms
royalslider.css
340 ms
style.css
367 ms
style.css
511 ms
preset_styles.css
424 ms
genericons.css
427 ms
font-awesome.css
452 ms
custom_script.css
520 ms
jetpack.css
541 ms
zotpress.shortcode.css
547 ms
main.min.css
577 ms
font-awesome.min.css
591 ms
main.min.css
594 ms
jquery.js
598 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
595 ms
wpi_script.js
618 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
661 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
676 ms
modernizr.js
673 ms
svg-icons.min.js
677 ms
front_global.js
681 ms
front_script.js
700 ms
ai.js
746 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
13 ms
e-201611.js
11 ms
plugin.css
712 ms
datatables.css
626 ms
infolux.uni.lu
835 ms
photon.js
606 ms
jquery.form.min.js
627 ms
scripts.js
643 ms
general.js
626 ms
common.js
603 ms
thickbox.js
608 ms
google.js
596 ms
sdk.js
587 ms
facebook.js
594 ms
jquery.royalslider.js
603 ms
style.css
582 ms
plugins.min.js
690 ms
desktop-tablet.min.js
620 ms
desktop.min.js
596 ms
main.min.js
545 ms
wp-embed.min.js
531 ms
zotpress.shortcode.bib.js
576 ms
jquery.livequery.js
577 ms
effect.min.js
577 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
576 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
56 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
57 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
57 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
57 ms
ga.js
37 ms
logo.png
465 ms
pattern.jpg
649 ms
Schmetterling-Photo-187x119.jpg
387 ms
53-VillGleck-mdpi-270x202.jpg
464 ms
Auto-270x190.png
464 ms
Buchdeckel-LFA-270x399.jpg
462 ms
Vortrag-Maike3-270x202.jpg
463 ms
Vortrag-Anne-Marie3-270x202.jpg
483 ms
Flyer-Apero-2015-Merci-270x254.jpg
501 ms
loading_default.gif
485 ms
__utm.gif
317 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
633 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
600 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
580 ms
m8JJYqAhymuJ2Zb4xZ3F8fesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
310 ms
client:platform.js
382 ms
sdk.js
304 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
214 ms
g.gif
39 ms
166 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
22 ms
xd_arbiter.php
80 ms
xd_arbiter.php
85 ms
postmessageRelay
53 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
25 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
28 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
xd_arbiter.php
15 ms
engelmann.uni.lu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
engelmann.uni.lu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Engelmann.uni.lu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Engelmann.uni.lu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
engelmann.uni.lu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Engelmann Uni. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: