3.1 sec in total
814 ms
2 sec
267 ms
Visit irb.ufl.edu now to see the best up-to-date Irb Ufl content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about irb.ufl.edu
Visit irb.ufl.eduWe analyzed Irb.ufl.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 814 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Irb.ufl.edu rating and web reputation
irb.ufl.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
814 ms
165 ms
83 ms
126 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Irb.ufl.edu, 2% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (814 ms) belongs to the original domain Irb.ufl.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 529.6 kB (61%)
865.2 kB
335.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Irb.ufl.edu main page is 865.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 297.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Irb Ufl needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 204.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 232.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irb.ufl.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 232.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (63%)
80
30
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Irb Ufl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
irb.ufl.edu
814 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
165 ms
child-pages-shortcode.min.css
83 ms
default.min.css
126 ms
wp-ui.css
133 ms
wpui-sevin.css
140 ms
css.php
172 ms
irb.ufl.edu
344 ms
jquery.min.js
84 ms
modernizr-1.7.min.js
167 ms
child-pages-shortcode.min.js
165 ms
core.min.js
179 ms
widget.min.js
199 ms
tabs.min.js
201 ms
accordion.min.js
203 ms
mouse.min.js
208 ms
resizable.min.js
219 ms
draggable.min.js
238 ms
button.min.js
243 ms
position.min.js
243 ms
dialog.min.js
245 ms
sortable.min.js
261 ms
irb.ufl.edu
412 ms
wp-ui.js
312 ms
plusone.js
62 ms
all.js
385 ms
widgets.js
199 ms
pfp.css
273 ms
reset.css
252 ms
grid.css
268 ms
typography.css
283 ms
style.css
296 ms
sidebar-nav-collapse.css
301 ms
mega-menu.css
351 ms
prettyPhoto.css
351 ms
jquery.cycle.min.js
341 ms
autoclear.js
342 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
341 ms
institutional-nav.js
347 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
346 ms
script.js
352 ms
mega-menu.js
335 ms
feature-slider.js
357 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
350 ms
comment-reply.min.js
344 ms
wp-embed.min.js
321 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
58 ms
institutional.css
56 ms
featured-content.css
52 ms
widgets.css
47 ms
shortcodes.css
43 ms
41 ms
ga.js
482 ms
bg-institutional-nav.jpg
467 ms
uf_inst_logo.png
466 ms
bg-downarrow.png
463 ms
bg-inst-sub-mega.jpg
464 ms
menu-florida-mag.jpg
465 ms
bkgd-left.jpg
467 ms
ufl-utility-buttons.png
468 ms
bg-sprite-transparent.png
477 ms
header-search-btn-orange.jpg
469 ms
bg-primary-nav.jpg
469 ms
bg-sprite-flat.jpg
468 ms
bg-primary-nav-item.jpg
470 ms
bg-dropdown-icon.png
471 ms
bg-mega-sub.jpg
471 ms
bg-content.jpg
472 ms
bg-content-shadow.png
473 ms
bg-sidebar-nav-li.png
474 ms
bg-orange-bullet.png
474 ms
bg-footer.png
478 ms
bg-footer-border.png
475 ms
bg-institutional-footer-wrap.jpg
476 ms
uf_monogram.png
477 ms
uf_logo_full.png
476 ms
xd_arbiter.php
132 ms
xd_arbiter.php
256 ms
ui-icons.png
63 ms
ufshands-webfont.woff
43 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
print.css
41 ms
ufshands-webfont.ttf
73 ms
irb.ufl.edu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
irb.ufl.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
irb.ufl.edu SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irb.ufl.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Irb.ufl.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
irb.ufl.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Irb Ufl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: