14.1 sec in total
417 ms
6.3 sec
7.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Ul content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ul.to
the easiest way to backup and share your files with everyone.
Visit ul.toWe analyzed Ul.to page load time and found that the first response time was 417 ms and then it took 13.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
ul.to performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value3.7 s
86/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
417 ms
275 ms
382 ms
433 ms
350 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ul.to, 4% (1 request) were made to Lp.longtailvideo.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Uploaded.net.
Page size can be reduced by 995.0 kB (64%)
1.6 MB
558.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Ul.to main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 780.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ul images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 300.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 300.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 669.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ul.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 669.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)
22
12
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ul. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
uploaded.net
417 ms
layout.css
275 ms
noIE.css
382 ms
protoculous.js
433 ms
app.js
350 ms
history.js
399 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
398 ms
element-min.js
398 ms
uploader-min.js
383 ms
jwplayer.js
1531 ms
script.js
1530 ms
start.js
1945 ms
bg.png
506 ms
layout.png
595 ms
environment.jpg
596 ms
box.png
596 ms
shadow_logo.png
595 ms
logo.png
703 ms
cloud.png
450 ms
sharing-3.js
910 ms
intro.png
908 ms
intro.png
840 ms
signika400.woff
840 ms
signika300.woff
840 ms
signika600.woff
1040 ms
ga.js
486 ms
ul.to accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
ul.to best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ul.to SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
DE
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ul.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Ul.to main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
ul.to
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ul. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: