Tools & Wizards About Us
ultrathin.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

ultrathin.com

Home - UltraThin Ribbons & Medals - Custom Military Sets Since 1986

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

351 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

174 ms

ultrathin.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ultra Thin content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ultrathin.com

Need thin ribbon sets? UltraThin is your complete custom source for military thin ribbons and medals since 1986. We proudly serve all branches and civilian uniformed services. Army, Navy, Air Force, M...

Visit ultrathin.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultrathin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 351 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultrathin.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.1

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ultrathin.com

351 ms

overlib.js

486 ms

loader.js

8 ms

impl-1_22.js

4 ms

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Ultrathin.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (486 ms) belongs to the original domain Ultrathin.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.4 kB (30%)

Content Size

246.5 kB

After Optimization

173.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ultrathin.com main page is 246.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 127.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 15.1 kB

  • Original 19.0 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 18 B

  • Original 127.9 kB
  • After minification 127.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultra Thin images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 58.3 kB

  • Original 99.6 kB
  • After minification 85.2 kB
  • After compression 41.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultra Thin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ultrathin.com

ultrathin.com

351 ms

overlib.js

overlib.js

486 ms

loader.js

loader.js

8 ms

impl-1_22.js

impl-1_22.js

4 ms

33 ms

top-left2.jpg

top-left2.jpg

148 ms

topper-allservices2.gif

topper-allservices2.gif

216 ms

sideview-oval-fth.jpg

sideview-oval-fth.jpg

190 ms

NDOS.jpg

NDOS.jpg

129 ms

89S.jpg

89S.jpg

221 ms

87C.jpg

87C.jpg

149 ms

apair.jpg

apair.jpg

447 ms

front_top.JPG

front_top.JPG

439 ms

sm_verisign.gif

sm_verisign.gif

220 ms

n2.g

n2.g

7 ms

yellowgreybk.gif

yellowgreybk.gif

231 ms

35 ms

ga.js

ga.js

5 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

ultrathin.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ultrathin.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ultrathin.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultrathin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultrathin.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ultrathin.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultra Thin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: