Tools & Wizards About Us
upack.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

upack.com

Household Moving Company | U-Pack

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

906 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

upack.com screenshot

About Website

Visit upack.com now to see the best up-to-date U Pack content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about upack.com

Planning an out of state move? U-Pack Moving is the affordable solution. You pack, load and unload, and U-Pack drives. Compare to traditional moving companies and see how much you can save!

Visit upack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Upack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 906 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

upack.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,220 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.6 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.upack.com

906 ms

css_FKxATdfoQM6iU2sHQxwB59qBEqJYmIzosYzg3gDsZ1c.css

11 ms

css_EJToikLloeCpsAQ3_ZskVAT9YdaJ1q5TTznFjaW8W2Y.css

12 ms

U-Pack-Logo-Dark-Gray-min.png

130 ms

trans.png

124 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Upack.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (906 ms) belongs to the original domain Upack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 432.7 kB (64%)

Content Size

679.1 kB

After Optimization

246.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Upack.com main page is 679.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 372.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 60.1 kB
  • After minification 55.7 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 95.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. U Pack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 58.2 kB

  • Original 144.7 kB
  • After minification 144.7 kB
  • After compression 86.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.2 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 323.4 kB

  • Original 372.9 kB
  • After minification 353.7 kB
  • After compression 49.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Upack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 323.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (39%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of U Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.upack.com

www.upack.com

906 ms

css_FKxATdfoQM6iU2sHQxwB59qBEqJYmIzosYzg3gDsZ1c.css

css_FKxATdfoQM6iU2sHQxwB59qBEqJYmIzosYzg3gDsZ1c.css

11 ms

css_EJToikLloeCpsAQ3_ZskVAT9YdaJ1q5TTznFjaW8W2Y.css

css_EJToikLloeCpsAQ3_ZskVAT9YdaJ1q5TTznFjaW8W2Y.css

12 ms

U-Pack-Logo-Dark-Gray-min.png

U-Pack-Logo-Dark-Gray-min.png

130 ms

trans.png

trans.png

124 ms

quote_spritev2.png

quote_spritev2.png

132 ms

nr-852.min.js

nr-852.min.js

15 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

85 ms

jquery_functions_20153641119-min.js

jquery_functions_20153641119-min.js

20 ms

f86eb01eb3

f86eb01eb3

62 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

237 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

223 ms

postload.css

postload.css

196 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

223 ms

postload.css

postload.css

208 ms

float.js

float.js

221 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

238 ms

event.php

event.php

132 ms

quote_banner_tran.png

quote_banner_tran.png

124 ms

house_to_trailer.png

house_to_trailer.png

116 ms

state_to_state.png

state_to_state.png

115 ms

trailer_to_house.png

trailer_to_house.png

115 ms

upack_moving_company_chart.png

upack_moving_company_chart.png

116 ms

coverage_map.png

coverage_map.png

115 ms

bbb.png

bbb.png

116 ms

secured_site.png

secured_site.png

115 ms

upack-logo-pinterest.png

upack-logo-pinterest.png

115 ms

upack_bg.png

upack_bg.png

13 ms

call_icon.png

call_icon.png

295 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

289 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

213 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

203 ms

Accessibility Review

upack.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

upack.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

upack.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Upack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Upack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

upack.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of U Pack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: