Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

utt66.ru

Урал Табак - табак для кальяна, уголь для кальяна, кальяны, табачная продукция, электронные сигареты, сигары и сигариллы в Екатеринбурге

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

926 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

445 ms

utt66.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Utt 66 content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about utt66.ru

Компания Урал Табак предлагает табак для кальяна оптом, кальяны, уголь для кальяна, табачная продукция, подсы (pods, podсы, одноразовые) электронные сигареты, сигары и сигариллы в Екатеринбурге

Visit utt66.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Utt66.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 926 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

utt66.ru performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

utt66.ru

926 ms

common.css

687 ms

jquery-1.5.min.js

1250 ms

caha.css

456 ms

lib.js

878 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Utt66.ru, 13% (4 requests) were made to Templates.ural66.ru and 13% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Utt66.ural66.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 184.4 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Utt66.ru main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 19.9 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 44.3 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Utt 66 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 109.0 kB

  • Original 165.9 kB
  • After minification 162.0 kB
  • After compression 56.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 20.6 kB
  • After minification 17.4 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Utt66.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (10%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Utt 66. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

utt66.ru accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

utt66.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

utt66.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Utt66.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Utt66.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Utt 66. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: