7.5 sec in total
115 ms
6.5 sec
863 ms
Click here to check amazing UX Mag content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about uxmag.com
Defining and Informing the Complex Field of User Experience (UX)
Visit uxmag.comWe analyzed Uxmag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
uxmag.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value3,350 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.09
92/100
15%
Value26.0 s
0/100
10%
115 ms
4835 ms
27 ms
38 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 137 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (97 requests) were addressed to the original Uxmag.com, 4% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Widget.sndcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Uxmag.com.
Page size can be reduced by 593.3 kB (9%)
6.7 MB
6.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Uxmag.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 202.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 202.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 383.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. UX Mag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Uxmag.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 99 (79%)
126
27
The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UX Mag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 59 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 42 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
uxmag.com
115 ms
uxmag.com
4835 ms
style.css
27 ms
style.min.css
38 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
34 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
78 ms
views-frontend.css
40 ms
eae.min.css
42 ms
css
51 ms
dashicons.min.css
54 ms
index.css
51 ms
share-this.css
165 ms
frontend.min.css
77 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
59 ms
frontend.min.css
69 ms
swiper.min.css
76 ms
post-10901.css
79 ms
frontend.min.css
87 ms
all.min.css
98 ms
v4-shims.min.css
101 ms
post-10906.css
148 ms
post-14213.css
102 ms
post-14211.css
110 ms
style.css
107 ms
genesis-overrides.css
118 ms
ecs-style.css
115 ms
post-10951.css
129 ms
post-10955.css
130 ms
post-10961.css
134 ms
post-10963.css
133 ms
post-10995.css
147 ms
post-11034.css
143 ms
post-11045.css
148 ms
post-11137.css
148 ms
post-11162.css
171 ms
post-12385.css
168 ms
post-13859.css
167 ms
css
50 ms
toolset-common-es-frontend.js
177 ms
adsbygoogle.js
428 ms
widgets.js
41 ms
fontawesome.min.css
160 ms
regular.min.css
161 ms
solid.min.css
156 ms
post-14486.css
157 ms
animations.min.css
167 ms
brands.min.css
146 ms
jquery.min.js
143 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
153 ms
iconHelper.js
147 ms
custom.js
139 ms
share-this.js
140 ms
twitter.js
139 ms
facebook.js
145 ms
reddit.js
142 ms
email.js
124 ms
ecs_ajax_pagination.js
127 ms
ecs.js
135 ms
email-decode.min.js
115 ms
dynamic-conditions-public.js
127 ms
eae.min.js
158 ms
index.min.js
153 ms
promotion.js
130 ms
animated-main.min.js
198 ms
magnific.min.js
158 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
154 ms
superfish.min.js
153 ms
superfish.args.min.js
143 ms
skip-links.min.js
141 ms
v4-shims.min.js
145 ms
responsive-menus.min.js
144 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
143 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
138 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
129 ms
waypoints.min.js
159 ms
core.min.js
189 ms
frontend.min.js
148 ms
ecspro.js
147 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
146 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
176 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
169 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
198 ms
hooks.min.js
157 ms
i18n.min.js
189 ms
frontend.min.js
184 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
183 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
180 ms
gtm.js
110 ms
ukraine-flag.png
146 ms
header-logo.png
147 ms
12.png
191 ms
book.png
147 ms
JordanOxfordPaper_NewLeadBanner.png
183 ms
bannergartner.png
186 ms
smali.png
183 ms
Rectangle-22.png
181 ms
Banner-UXM-Pod-mini.png
191 ms
podcast-1-1-pwvdl7wfj9krcdufxv84buz5m3ky6hl4nwzbt8es8w.png
167 ms
footer-logo.png
166 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
29 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
30 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
59 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
61 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
74 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
74 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
166 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
312 ms
js
217 ms
analytics.js
182 ms
hotjar-2690290.js
327 ms
quant.js
211 ms
insight.min.js
210 ms
lftracker_v1_lYNOR8xorVGaWQJZ.js
491 ms
672 ms
672 ms
654 ms
672 ms
670 ms
show_ads_impl.js
556 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
180 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
53 ms
collect
133 ms
settings
196 ms
rules-p-nqXyDs9XeEmQX.js
103 ms
modules.842bcec28f9fd12bb79e.js
40 ms
collect
39 ms
js
55 ms
pixel;r=1222761715;source=gtm;rf=0;a=p-nqXyDs9XeEmQX;url=https%3A%2F%2Fuxmag.com%2F;uht=2;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1439924182-1714877302334;pbc=;ns=0;ce=1;qjs=1;qv=b70d35e8-20231208114759;cm=;gdpr=0;ref=;d=uxmag.com;dst=0;et=1714877302440;tzo=-180;ogl=locale.en_US%2Ctype.website%2Ctitle.UX%20Magazine%20%7C%20The%20Community%20Of%20Over%20515%252C000%2Cdescription.Defining%20and%20Informing%20the%20Complex%20Field%20of%20User%20Experience%20(UX)%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Fuxmag%252Ecom%2F%2Csite_name.UX%20Magazine%2Cimage.https%3A%2F%2Fuxmag%252Ecom%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F10%2Fleadbanner%252Epng%2Cimage%3Awidth.1200%2Cimage%3Aheight.627%2Cimage%3Atype.image%2Fpng;ses=79ebaad8-bcce-4abd-ba75-4e7f14688e79;mdl=
22 ms
tr-rc.lfeeder.com
45 ms
zrt_lookup.html
20 ms
ads
29 ms
widget-5-4e9069de0c32.js
24 ms
widget-8-08de3170cf3d.js
25 ms
widget-9-18372d022095.js
39 ms
logo-200x120-3190df52.png
29 ms
widget-0-15290ac3d170.js
15 ms
widget-1-500155b72734.js
14 ms
uxmag.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
uxmag.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
uxmag.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Uxmag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Uxmag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
uxmag.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of UX Mag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: