2.9 sec in total
249 ms
2.5 sec
84 ms
Welcome to billing.visualwebtechnologies.com homepage info - get ready to check Billing Visual Web Technologies best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about billing.visualwebtechnologies.com
Visit billing.visualwebtechnologies.comWe analyzed Billing.visualwebtechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 249 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
billing.visualwebtechnologies.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value17.3 s
0/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value2,600 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.318
36/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
249 ms
95 ms
11 ms
46 ms
99 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Billing.visualwebtechnologies.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Billing.visualwebtechnologies.com.
Page size can be reduced by 247.1 kB (7%)
3.3 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Billing.visualwebtechnologies.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.5 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Billing Visual Web Technologies images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 57.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.2 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Billing.visualwebtechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.2 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (45%)
91
50
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Billing Visual Web Technologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
index.php
249 ms
css2
95 ms
all.min.css
11 ms
theme.min.css
46 ms
style.css
99 ms
custom.css
44 ms
alpine.min.js
90 ms
style.css
177 ms
custom.css
65 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
77 ms
1custom.css
63 ms
scripts.min.js
175 ms
export.css
88 ms
amcharts.js
172 ms
serial.js
172 ms
patterns.js
171 ms
export.js
173 ms
bandwidth.js
173 ms
js
247 ms
js
476 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
173 ms
webfonts.css
145 ms
webfonts.css
71 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
126 ms
fbevents.js
216 ms
gtm.js
213 ms
close.png
129 ms
loading.gif
202 ms
prev.png
201 ms
next.png
203 ms
logo.png
204 ms
bg.png
220 ms
list-check.png
203 ms
1.png
205 ms
2.png
207 ms
4.png
208 ms
3.png
207 ms
2.png
205 ms
5.png
208 ms
3.png
213 ms
4.png
209 ms
feature-2.png
212 ms
6.png
211 ms
applications-bg.png
213 ms
wordpress.png
214 ms
joomla.png
215 ms
magento.png
216 ms
drupal.png
216 ms
oscommerce.png
219 ms
wordpress-in.png
220 ms
wordpress-active.png
228 ms
joomla-in.png
222 ms
joomla-active.png
223 ms
magento-in.png
225 ms
magento-active.png
229 ms
drupal-in.png
233 ms
drupal-active.png
230 ms
oscommerce-in.png
236 ms
oscommerce-active.png
238 ms
usa.png
234 ms
ca.png
238 ms
no.png
239 ms
js
407 ms
fi.png
406 ms
ru.png
167 ms
ko.png
165 ms
map.png
164 ms
quote.png
268 ms
testimonial-arrow-left.png
269 ms
testimonial-arrow-right.png
401 ms
intel.png
393 ms
rostelecom.png
391 ms
cpanel.png
401 ms
interworx.png
399 ms
kvm.png
400 ms
supermicro.png
398 ms
cloudflare.png
397 ms
footer-logo.png
1443 ms
fb.png
1443 ms
twt.png
1442 ms
insta.png
1342 ms
ProximaNova-Semibold.otf
1132 ms
ProximaNova-Regular.otf
1414 ms
ProximaNova-Bold.otf
1160 ms
DINNextW10-Medium.otf
1161 ms
DINNextW01-Bold.otf
1161 ms
DINNextW10-Black.otf
1161 ms
DINNextW10-Regular.otf
1161 ms
DINNextW10-Light.otf
1198 ms
188 ms
206 ms
175 ms
152 ms
pixel
142 ms
qevents.js
158 ms
137 ms
136 ms
pixel
129 ms
38 ms
pixel
35 ms
billing.visualwebtechnologies.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
billing.visualwebtechnologies.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
billing.visualwebtechnologies.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Billing.visualwebtechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Billing.visualwebtechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
billing.visualwebtechnologies.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Billing Visual Web Technologies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: