7.5 sec in total
191 ms
5.5 sec
1.9 sec
Welcome to kindersitz.vergleich.org homepage info - get ready to check Kindersitz Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about kindersitz.vergleich.org
llll➤ Aktueller und unabhängiger Kindersitz Test bzw. Vergleich 2023 inkl. ✓ Vergleichssieger, ✓ Preis-Leistungs-Sieger uvm. ➤ Jetzt vergleichen!
Visit kindersitz.vergleich.orgWe analyzed Kindersitz.vergleich.org page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
kindersitz.vergleich.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value11,230 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
191 ms
1004 ms
2340 ms
64 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Kindersitz.vergleich.org, 17% (15 requests) were made to Vergleich.org and 10% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.vergleich.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.optimizely.com.
Page size can be reduced by 802.3 kB (59%)
1.4 MB
559.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Kindersitz.vergleich.org main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 576.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 130.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kindersitz Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 326.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 326.1 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 332.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kindersitz.vergleich.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 332.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (44%)
79
44
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kindersitz Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
kindersitz.vergleich.org
191 ms
1004 ms
2323230643.js
2340 ms
css
64 ms
main.css
183 ms
head.min.js
270 ms
adsbygoogle.js
37 ms
jquery.min.js
46 ms
all.min.js
356 ms
tr.js
279 ms
analytics.js
188 ms
sdk.js
206 ms
logo-white.svg
184 ms
britax-roemer-duo-plus-231.jpg
837 ms
10299.gif
1447 ms
maxi-cosi-pebble-17.jpg
966 ms
cybex-sirona-29.jpg
1354 ms
kiddy-phoenixfix-pro2-244.jpg
1352 ms
cybex-solution-x2-fix-209.jpg
1353 ms
storchenmuehle-solar-88.jpg
1352 ms
migo-saturn-41.jpg
1353 ms
1491.gif
1380 ms
14654.gif
1380 ms
3667.gif
1380 ms
10433.gif
1380 ms
star-full.svg
662 ms
star-half.svg
656 ms
star-empty.svg
651 ms
amazon.gif
686 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
722 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
849 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
1105 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
1105 ms
icon-font.woff
964 ms
d9029ab67da94cef8a137c0d477e4b98
1555 ms
britax-roemer-duo-plus-231-200x200.jpg
1554 ms
cybex-solution-x2-fix-209-200x200.jpg
1762 ms
ca-pub-4407413360917429.js
650 ms
zrt_lookup.html
746 ms
show_ads_impl.js
1054 ms
MM9KPpotsJU
937 ms
logo-small.svg
865 ms
collect
581 ms
collect
954 ms
938 ms
icon-top.svg
779 ms
footer_pfeil_newsletter.png
781 ms
widgets.js
905 ms
platform.js
1120 ms
nav.json
887 ms
xd_arbiter.php
437 ms
like.php
670 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
421 ms
www-embed-player.js
465 ms
base.js
508 ms
ga-audiences
349 ms
ads
534 ms
osd.js
244 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
227 ms
ads
481 ms
ads
362 ms
ads
484 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
189 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
120 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
223 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
106 ms
fastbutton
216 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.de.html
34 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
52 ms
ad_status.js
80 ms
jot
223 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
39 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
44 ms
blank.gif
205 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
34 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
postmessageRelay
73 ms
10994802015553879083
40 ms
abg.js
43 ms
m_js_controller.js
56 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
36 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
112 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
111 ms
s
94 ms
x_button_blue2.png
96 ms
favicon
85 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
56 ms
12832655460766421813
24 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
27 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
6 ms
kindersitz.vergleich.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
kindersitz.vergleich.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
kindersitz.vergleich.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kindersitz.vergleich.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Kindersitz.vergleich.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
kindersitz.vergleich.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kindersitz Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: