3.8 sec in total
987 ms
2.5 sec
327 ms
Welcome to verbraucherschutz.ag homepage info - get ready to check VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ best content right away, or after learning these important things about verbraucherschutz.ag
Verbraucherschutzforum.ag - Das Verbraucherprotal rund um Verbraucherschutz, Verbraucherinformationen und Verbraucher-News. Das Top Portal für Verbraucher.
Visit verbraucherschutz.agWe analyzed Verbraucherschutz.ag page load time and found that the first response time was 987 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
verbraucherschutz.ag performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.4 s
0/100
10%
Value18.8 s
0/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value1,220 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value21.1 s
1/100
10%
987 ms
91 ms
264 ms
180 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Verbraucherschutz.ag, 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (987 ms) belongs to the original domain Verbraucherschutz.ag.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (54%)
3.5 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Verbraucherschutz.ag main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 505.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 505.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Verbraucherschutz.ag needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (52%)
62
30
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
verbraucherschutz.ag
987 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
91 ms
dashicons.min.css
264 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
180 ms
settings.css
182 ms
style.css
185 ms
main.css
383 ms
plugins.css
291 ms
media.css
270 ms
js_composer.min.css
460 ms
jquery.js
367 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
353 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
447 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
408 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
core.min.js
438 ms
widget.min.js
458 ms
mouse.min.js
560 ms
resizable.min.js
565 ms
draggable.min.js
566 ms
button.min.js
567 ms
position.min.js
567 ms
dialog.min.js
568 ms
wpdialog.min.js
598 ms
main.js
598 ms
plugins.min.js
622 ms
wp-embed.min.js
623 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
656 ms
logo-dark.png
100 ms
logo-hd-dark.png
112 ms
transparent.png
140 ms
banner-3.png
546 ms
banner-2.png
544 ms
banner-1.png
595 ms
banner-ogi.gif
542 ms
banner-diebewertung.jpg
539 ms
TuNVEiK7U2-179x120.jpg
284 ms
94cnlchIfd-179x120.jpg
285 ms
EWWqULjlPA-179x120.jpg
285 ms
JXmhBkBrZt-179x120.jpg
295 ms
cMYv5MQXfx-179x120.jpg
306 ms
YlLQBPaH49-179x120.jpg
306 ms
EwfrADZivr-179x120.jpg
537 ms
0Z040QfXs5-179x120.jpg
538 ms
DIb1GwbOin-179x120.jpg
538 ms
momizat.ttf
598 ms
archivonarrow-bold-webfont.woff
479 ms
archivonarrow-regular-webfont.woff
480 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
480 ms
brankic.ttf
717 ms
ca-pub-5055286848708513.js
160 ms
zrt_lookup.html
203 ms
show_ads_impl.js
150 ms
ads
274 ms
osd.js
11 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
136 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
138 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
140 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
143 ms
m_js_controller.js
48 ms
abg.js
63 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
57 ms
imgad
45 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
45 ms
s
28 ms
x_button_blue2.png
23 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
3 ms
revicons.woff
91 ms
print.css
89 ms
verbraucherschutz.ag accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
verbraucherschutz.ag best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
verbraucherschutz.ag SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Verbraucherschutz.ag can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Verbraucherschutz.ag main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
verbraucherschutz.ag
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: