9.8 sec in total
2.3 sec
7.2 sec
257 ms
Click here to check amazing Vestergaard Company content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vestergaardcompany.com
Explore Vestergaard Company Here at Vestergaard Company we do the best work, with the best people. Vestergaard Company manufactures and markets high-tech specia
Visit vestergaardcompany.comWe analyzed Vestergaardcompany.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
vestergaardcompany.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value13,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value24.0 s
1/100
10%
2290 ms
322 ms
214 ms
216 ms
348 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Vestergaardcompany.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Vestergaardcompany.com.
Page size can be reduced by 925.1 kB (60%)
1.5 MB
612.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Vestergaardcompany.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 699.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vestergaard Company needs image optimization as it can save up to 80.0 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 504.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 504.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 305.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vestergaardcompany.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 305.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (68%)
73
23
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vestergaard Company. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vestergaardcompany.com
2290 ms
style.css
322 ms
skeleton-responsive.css
214 ms
layout-responsive.css
216 ms
style-custom.css
348 ms
css
25 ms
front.css
217 ms
layerslider.css
348 ms
style.css
345 ms
style.css
345 ms
jetpack.css
532 ms
superfish.css
427 ms
prettyPhoto.css
429 ms
nivo-slider.css
427 ms
wp-ui.css
432 ms
wpui-light.css
435 ms
css.php
563 ms
jquery.js
654 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
446 ms
cufon.js
556 ms
front.js
451 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
651 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
555 ms
jquerytransit.js
558 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
575 ms
core.min.js
663 ms
widget.min.js
662 ms
tabs.min.js
668 ms
accordion.min.js
682 ms
mouse.min.js
755 ms
resizable.min.js
759 ms
draggable.min.js
768 ms
button.min.js
767 ms
position.min.js
774 ms
dialog.min.js
788 ms
sortable.min.js
863 ms
2473 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
79 ms
e-201609.js
4 ms
wp-ui.js
875 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
762 ms
Museo_Sans_500.font.js
1017 ms
superfish.js
782 ms
supersub.js
731 ms
easy-table.css
737 ms
hoverIntent.js
885 ms
gdl-scripts.js
884 ms
jquery.easing.js
884 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
806 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
806 ms
wp-embed.min.js
801 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
804 ms
analytics.js
148 ms
collect
62 ms
bagground.jpg
165 ms
VC_baal_for_web2.png
165 ms
facebook.png
165 ms
linkedin.png
168 ms
youtube.png
168 ms
email.png
165 ms
gradient-top-gray-40px.png
219 ms
find-17px.png
217 ms
loading.gif
219 ms
banner_beta-14-980x270.jpg
334 ms
banner_beta-7-980x270.jpg
330 ms
banner_beta-6-980x270.jpg
334 ms
banner_beta-5-980x270.jpg
430 ms
banner_beta-1-980x270.jpg
536 ms
gradient-vertical-6px.png
331 ms
Forside_DeIcing.jpg
439 ms
Forside_VTS1.jpg
440 ms
Forside_WS.jpg
441 ms
QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
131 ms
g.gif
7 ms
vestergaardcompany.com
1910 ms
vestergaardcompany.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
vestergaardcompany.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
vestergaardcompany.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vestergaardcompany.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vestergaardcompany.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vestergaardcompany.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vestergaard Company. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: