4.1 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.9 sec
156 ms
Visit viability.io now to see the best up-to-date Viability content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about viability.io
Boost profitability and future-proof your hospitality business with AI-driven rostering, ordering, and forecasting software by Viability.io. Start for free today!
Visit viability.ioWe analyzed Viability.io page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
viability.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value48.9 s
0/100
10%
Value58,990 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value78.8 s
0/100
10%
1054 ms
60 ms
56 ms
129 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Viability.io, 60% (38 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 32% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 547.5 kB (52%)
1.1 MB
511.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Viability.io main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 598.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 490.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 490.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Viability needs image optimization as it can save up to 57.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 48 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (19%)
53
43
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Viability. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.viability.io
1054 ms
minified.js
60 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
56 ms
polyfill.min.js
129 ms
bootstrap-features.24d4529b.bundle.min.js
53 ms
main.24eb524d.bundle.min.js
55 ms
lodash.min.js
52 ms
react.production.min.js
125 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
143 ms
thunderbolt
25 ms
elementory-browser-support.min.js
2 ms
thunderbolt
7 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
22 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
21 ms
e40d32_14dca2b0fdec4b01b986ee409a99e646~mv2.jpg
358 ms
staticCss.min.css
72 ms
1_%20Dashboard.png
521 ms
e40d32_bd82a00ae08248cd954bc716866c060b~mv2.png
514 ms
e40d32_9f02923768734e549c1f00e38269be3f~mv2.png
512 ms
e40d32_07612cdca2ca4b84a932103ee2a17285~mv2.png
545 ms
e40d32_c351eee2a4d3486ca075725d9db70556~mv2.jpg
531 ms
e40d32_74035fc067264f2bac3126cbffd2b7d6~mv2.jpg
512 ms
e40d32_e81285b5f23248a59bd756ed46b60632~mv2.jpg
594 ms
e40d32_6041fbbcdc124dfea54c86138e688363~mv2.jpg
652 ms
e40d32_e4b1cdafe2ac409796c10582be215242~mv2.jpg
612 ms
e40d32_1ed825352dd740ebafc0e86ed4a98b6e~mv2.jpg
666 ms
e40d32_388751155643487cb363fdfcc8416769~mv2.png
679 ms
e40d32_83721d0a77814d5ca3f3e662f21700b9~mv2.png
661 ms
revenue%20forecast.png
781 ms
e40d32_7bcc8fe89a3643199e82bdddc2212489~mv2.png
728 ms
e40d32_4e02753afcff4771abc305eec8e55de6~mv2.png
885 ms
e40d32_a48ce7ef71cf4ecbbfc39510167af723~mv2.png
798 ms
3033f0_143eac10d0d843ec94afc1595fec6d6b~mv2.png
811 ms
e40d32_0fdf40ee41dc4b76941317d4b9097d09~mv2.png
805 ms
e40d32_73d82b363b8745349fde1d613ef11dcd~mv2.png
876 ms
e40d32_2676bdcf66a04ea6961fe86e82a7fe18~mv2.png
929 ms
e40d32_619586387d454493a7ae28bd94be8f46~mv2.png
948 ms
e40d32_767eb48d97d14bb79d06249eecf68be9~mv2.png
959 ms
1_edited.png
943 ms
e40d32_b8bfa929fd274dadba2bc4cf60277c99~mv2.png
877 ms
e40d32_1faf19914d9d43e5b08cb48a20af9921~mv2.png
984 ms
Draft%20orders%20phone.png
1038 ms
Ordering%20phone.png
1043 ms
1_1%20Cotto%20Cafe.jpg
1086 ms
3_1%20White%20Picket%20Coffee%20House.jpg
1098 ms
5_%20Luigi%20Restaurant.jpg
1125 ms
e40d32_a6b987b324154ee9966b6d5d77b63119~mv2.png
1138 ms
e40d32_1a515a40cf604320adedc3959771ccf7~mv2.png
1170 ms
e40d32_a4b5bd961ced4ebab2e9548d0364cff1~mv2.png
1170 ms
30e351_b0aa8724eff04126933132ffb0c980b2~mv2.gif
1178 ms
file.woff
1244 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
81 ms
AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff
79 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
12 ms
AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff
81 ms
Xyjz-jNkfiYuJf8UC3Lizw.woff
82 ms
idLYXfFa1c7oAPILDl4z0fesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
81 ms
file.woff
1126 ms
file.woff
1068 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
18 ms
bolt-performance
87 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
69 ms
right-arrow.svg
68 ms
viability.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
viability.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
viability.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Viability.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Viability.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
viability.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Viability. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: