4.9 sec in total
346 ms
4.3 sec
332 ms
Click here to check amazing Video Display content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about videodisplay.net
Con l'assemblamento interno dei componenti e cartotecnica garantiamo tutti i nostri prodotti. Video brochure con nuovi schermi hd ips certificati CE
Visit videodisplay.netWe analyzed Videodisplay.net page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
videodisplay.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.6 s
0/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value15.9 s
0/100
10%
Value480 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.095
91/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
346 ms
2028 ms
218 ms
321 ms
218 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Videodisplay.net, 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Videodisplay.net.
Page size can be reduced by 655.0 kB (29%)
2.2 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Videodisplay.net main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Video Display images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 488.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 488.9 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videodisplay.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)
72
27
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Video Display. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
videodisplay.net
346 ms
www.videodisplay.net
2028 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
218 ms
prettyPhoto.css
321 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
218 ms
styles.css
220 ms
cli-style.css
221 ms
stylesheet.css
296 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
327 ms
style.css
326 ms
mappress.css
329 ms
meteor-slides.css
330 ms
style.css
608 ms
responsive.css
428 ms
shortcodes.css
435 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
436 ms
jquery.js
786 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
474 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
641 ms
video-lightbox.js
540 ms
cookielawinfo.js
544 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
581 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
689 ms
flags.js
652 ms
modernizr-2.0.6.min.js
806 ms
plugins.js
822 ms
script.js
749 ms
progression-shortcodes-lib.js
759 ms
comment-reply.min.js
820 ms
js
25 ms
jquery.gomap-1.3.2.min.js
859 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
1074 ms
jquery.metadata.v2.js
905 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
906 ms
slideshow.js
906 ms
element.js
35 ms
jquery.form.min.js
780 ms
scripts.js
823 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
857 ms
simple-contact-form-revisited-plugin.js
839 ms
common.js
8 ms
util.js
26 ms
geocoder.js
7 ms
header.png
172 ms
logo-video-display1.png
175 ms
video-brochure-audi.jpg
535 ms
video-book-bracco2.jpg
431 ms
video-brochure1.jpg
533 ms
video-card-box.jpg
570 ms
video-espositore.jpg
431 ms
video-card.jpg
837 ms
video-brochure-vitaros.jpg
641 ms
video-libro.jpg
652 ms
video-card.jpg
743 ms
italy.png
639 ms
audi.jpg
673 ms
unicredit.jpg
748 ms
bauli.jpg
750 ms
bracco.jpg
757 ms
marionnaud.jpg
809 ms
unox.jpg
851 ms
wish-days.jpg
854 ms
translateelement.css
73 ms
main.js
141 ms
justvectorv2-webfont.woff
840 ms
analytics.js
55 ms
overlay.png
710 ms
bg_bullets.png
791 ms
arrows.png
806 ms
element_main.js
41 ms
collect
12 ms
translate_24dp.png
65 ms
l
51 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
27 ms
videodisplay.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
videodisplay.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
videodisplay.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videodisplay.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Videodisplay.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
videodisplay.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Video Display. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: