Tools & Wizards About Us
videofoot.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

videofoot.in

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

607 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

285 ms

videofoot.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to videofoot.in homepage info - get ready to check Videofoot best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about videofoot.in

L'équipe de Craym Internet Technology est là pour vous aider.

Visit videofoot.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Videofoot.in page load time and found that the first response time was 607 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videofoot.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

videofoot.in

607 ms

StyleSheet.css

742 ms

jquery-1.4.2.js

839 ms

suckerfish_menu.js

753 ms

ga.js

877 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Videofoot.in, 86% (12 requests) were made to Craym.eu and 7% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (880 ms) relates to the external source Craym.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

233.5 kB

After Optimization

193.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Videofoot.in main page is 233.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 175.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 17.9 kB
  • After minification 15.3 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 175.6 kB
  • After minification 174.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videofoot images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 39.9 kB
  • After minification 39.9 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videofoot. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

videofoot.in

videofoot.in

607 ms

StyleSheet.css

StyleSheet.css

742 ms

jquery-1.4.2.js

jquery-1.4.2.js

839 ms

suckerfish_menu.js

suckerfish_menu.js

753 ms

ga.js

ga.js

877 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

880 ms

sprite_background_x.png

sprite_background_x.png

269 ms

null.png

null.png

272 ms

sprite_icons.png

sprite_icons.png

713 ms

New%20Logo%20Craym%20HD%20NOIR_145_h.png

New%20Logo%20Craym%20HD%20NOIR_145_h.png

361 ms

header_titre.png

header_titre.png

277 ms

fleche_titre.png

fleche_titre.png

540 ms

installation.jpg

installation.jpg

726 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

8 ms

SEO Factors

videofoot.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videofoot.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is French. Our system also found out that Videofoot.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

videofoot.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Videofoot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: