9.8 sec in total
2.9 sec
6 sec
982 ms
Welcome to videoink.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Video Ink best content right away, or after learning these important things about videoink.co.uk
Video Ink is an award winning Manchester video production company providing the best value video content service for brands and businesses.
Visit videoink.co.ukWe analyzed Videoink.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
videoink.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value16.5 s
0/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
2891 ms
190 ms
190 ms
196 ms
195 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Videoink.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Videoink.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 645.0 kB (48%)
1.3 MB
686.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Videoink.co.uk main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 521.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.9 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Video Ink images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 257.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 285.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videoink.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (70%)
76
23
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Video Ink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.videoink.co.uk
2891 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
190 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
190 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
196 ms
flexslider.css
195 ms
ut.portfolio.style.css
198 ms
prettyPhoto.css
307 ms
font-awesome.css
308 ms
ut-responsive-grid.css
303 ms
ut.table.style.css
304 ms
ut.animate.css
315 ms
ut.elastislide.css
397 ms
ut.fancyrotator.css
398 ms
ut.shortcode.css
400 ms
styles.css
393 ms
ut-fontface.css
416 ms
ut-superfish.css
490 ms
style.css
616 ms
jquery.js
704 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
525 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
528 ms
jquery.lazy.load.js
444 ms
modernizr.min.js
491 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
493 ms
jquery.elastislide.js
536 ms
jquery.queryloader2.min.js
684 ms
analytics.js
5 ms
collect
48 ms
collect
147 ms
web-logo-25.png
140 ms
about-min.jpg
494 ms
overlay-pattern.png
138 ms
ga-audiences
65 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.woff
210 ms
raleway-medium-webfont.woff
221 ms
raleway-extralight-webfont.woff
299 ms
divider.png
100 ms
raleway-semibold-webfont.woff
183 ms
197 ms
Sony-Final-2-w200h200.png
184 ms
4music-w200h200.png
255 ms
BBC-Final-w200h200.png
207 ms
The-Noise-Cartel-final-w200h200.png
368 ms
Nuclear-Final-min-300x300-w200h200.png
370 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
788 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
583 ms
play-black.jpg
642 ms
scripts.js
301 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
393 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
397 ms
tabs.collapse.min.js
401 ms
jquery.visible.min.js
489 ms
jquery.appear.js
486 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
496 ms
ut.scplugin.js
577 ms
toucheffects.min.js
578 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
588 ms
superfish.min.js
665 ms
retina.min.js
667 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js
681 ms
jquery.parallax.min.js
703 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
699 ms
ut-init.js
814 ms
jquery.isotope.perfectmasonry.min.js
815 ms
jquery.utmasonry.js
816 ms
ut.effects.js
816 ms
jquery.form.min.js
814 ms
player_api
102 ms
ajax-loader.gif
229 ms
footer-icon-2015-e1444231842233.png
243 ms
collect
46 ms
divider.png
187 ms
about-min.jpg
804 ms
web-logo-25.png
181 ms
overlay-pattern.png
170 ms
Sony-Final-2-w200h200.png
248 ms
256 ms
www-widgetapi.js
32 ms
tpNvoCB8O9o
77 ms
BBC-Final-w200h200.png
180 ms
Nuclear-Final-min-300x300-w200h200.png
264 ms
4music-w200h200.png
277 ms
play-black.jpg
488 ms
ajax-loader.gif
248 ms
The-Noise-Cartel-final-w200h200.png
343 ms
videoink.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
videoink.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
videoink.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videoink.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Videoink.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
videoink.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Video Ink. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: